Episode #599 Preview - Magis Magnifica Humanitas: Building Babel or Jerusalem

Last week, Ron and Ed began exploring Pope Leo XIV’s landmark social encyclical Magnifica Humanitas. This week, they continue the conversation, moving beyond first impressions into the document’s deeper implications for business, technology, and the future of human flourishing.

What does it mean to remain fully human in an age increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence? Can technology serve the common good without reducing people to data points or algorithms? And is AI simply another powerful tool—or does it force us to confront far more fundamental questions about freedom, responsibility, work, and what it means to become the person we are called to be?

Along the way, Ron and Ed reflect on the encyclical’s surprising engagement with economics, subsidiarity, solidarity, transhumanism, and the enduring tension between efficiency and human dignity. Whether you agree with every conclusion or not, Magnifica Humanitas offers one of the most thoughtful frameworks yet for understanding the AI revolution through the lens of philosophy, theology, and civilization itself.

Join us as we continue asking the question that lies at the heart of both the encyclical and The Soul of Enterprise: not simply what AI can do, but what kind of people—and what kind of society—it is helping us become.

Join us every Friday at 3pm ET / 12pm PT

  • You can watch us live at https://www.thesoulofenterprise.com/live (the podcast is available just a few hours after the show airs live)

  • You can also chat with us during the live stream on your preferred social network. Say hello on Facebook, YouTube, X/Twitter, or LinkedIn

  • Prefer email? Shoot us a note at asktsoe@verasage.com

As always, please check our website for upcoming and previous show notes and recordings, use Twitter to find the show at @AskTSOE or find us on Facebook.

The Soul of Enterprise show hosts, Ron Baker and Ed Kless, are on X (the artist formerly known as Twitter) at @ronaldbaker and @edkless, respectively (and obviously).