Professor Michael Munger returns to The Soul of Enterprise for a fourth visit and once again, the answer is transaction costs. Ron and Ed catch up with the Duke University economist, political scientist, author, and host of The Answer Is Transaction Costs to explore some of the provocative questions he has tackled in the podcast’s latest summer episodes.
Why is being late an economic problem rather than merely bad manners? How have social media dramatically lowered the cost of coordinating outrage? Can transaction costs even explain the battle between the person who makes a resolution tonight and the same person who breaks it tomorrow?
Along the way, we’ll explore Munger’s larger argument that transaction costs are hiding in plain sight, shaping markets, institutions, cooperation, incentives, and everyday human behavior. It’s another wide-ranging conversation with one of TSOE’s favorite economists and the Knower of Important Things.
About Michael C. Munger
Mike Munger is the Pfizer/Edmund T. Pratt, Jr. University Distinguished Professor at Duke University, with appointments in Political Science, Economics, and Public Policy. A former president of the Public Choice Society and former FTC staff economist, he studies markets, institutions, regulation, and the sharing economy. He is the author of Tomorrow 3.0 and The Sharing Economy and hosts The Answer Is Transaction Costs podcast.
Join us every Friday at 3pm ET / 12pm PT
You can watch us live at https://www.thesoulofenterprise.com/live (the podcast is available just a few hours after the show airs live)
You can also chat with us during the live stream on your preferred social network. Say hello on Facebook, YouTube, X/Twitter, or LinkedIn
Prefer email? Shoot us a note at asktsoe@verasage.com
As always, please check our website for upcoming and previous show notes and recordings, use Twitter to find the show at @AskTSOE or find us on Facebook.
The Soul of Enterprise show hosts, Ron Baker and Ed Kless, are on X (the artist formerly known as Twitter) at @ronaldbaker and @edkless, respectively (and obviously).