November 2022

Episode Reprise — Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Presents for the Holidays

[Editor’s Note: Some things are just too good not to share again. While our most ardent listeners are familiar with Episode #22, Scroogenomics, many may not be familiar with this specific show. This past Friday was Black Friday in the United States which means it’s time - once again - to talk about why you shouldn’t buy presents. Bah, humbug!!!]

[Additional Editor’s Note: Coincidentally, this year the replay of the Scroogenomics episode pairs quite well with last week’s episode featuring Professor Tony Gill in which we discussed the benefits of gift giving in the broader economy. Two shows, two different perspectives.]

On Black Friday, and right before Cyber Monday—the biggest shopping days of the year—Ed and Ron thought it would be fun to discuss the interesting, funny, and thought-provoking book by Joel Waldfogel: Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Presents for the Holidays.

The author makes the case that the deadweight loss to the economy from gift giving, in 2007, totaled $12 billion, out of approximately $66.5 Billion spent (about 12%). Citizens Against Government Waste would classify Christmas as a wasteful government program.

Gift giving severs link between buying decision and item’s value to its user—the transaction actually destroys value. To add insult to injury, we are obliged to pretend to be grateful!

His complaint is not the level of spending or the consumption, but the waste.

We discussed the four ways you can spend money in the economy:

 

Former Congressman Dick Armey pointed out how difficult spending is in Category II (Gift), let alone Category IV (Government):

Every year, I worry and fret select the right birthday gift for my wife, Susan. Every year, try as I might, I manage to choose the wrong thing. If I can’t figure the needs and desires of the one person who is closest to me in the world and who I deeply love and care for, how can we expect the government to do a better job?

Three groups spend other people’s money: children, thieves, politicians. All three need parental supervision.

Hierarchy of value of gift giving

  • Aunts & uncles & grandparents = 75%

  • Parents = 97%

  • Friends =91%

  • Siblings =99%

  • Significant others = 102%

Further, we spend approximately 2.8 billion hours shopping in December. To put that number in context, the old USSR—before it imploded—spent 35 billion hours annually standing in line for everyday products and services.

Infographic from Deloitte’s 2018 annual holiday survey

Economist Ian Ayres said this about Waldfogel’s book:

Joel Waldfogel is one of the smartest and funniest economists on the planet. I think of him every time I start to unwrap a present. Buy Scroogenomics for your friends and family. It makes the perfect Christmas gift.

Episode #417: Interview with Tony Gill

Waaay back in Episode 22, Ron and Ed detailed the ideas behind Joel Waldfogel's book, Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Presents for the Holidays. Waldfogel makes the case that the deadweight loss to the economy from gift giving, in 2007, totaled $12 billion, out of approximately $66.5 Billion spent (about 12%) and that we should all give cash rather than presents. In this episode, we spoke with Professor Tony Gill about his ideas around Rethinking Scroogenomics and some of his other writings.

Use these show notes to follow along with the audio…(scroll a bit further to see what a bot came up with)

Segment one:

  • Political science, sociology, and economics? Tony wanted to be a lawyer for about 1 week, was interested in politics, and was interested in economics. That doesn’t sound TOO far fetched now that Tony Gill has shared his background with us.

  • Adam Smith called himself a moral philosopher. This makes sense for Tony given his interest in both economics and religion.

  • What was the trigger for Tony’s interest in the Austrian school of economics? Paraphrasing his response: Being interested in both religion and economics already makes you a bit of an outcast so the Austrian approach made some sense.

  • Tony is a proud member of the Mount Pelerin society. It’s founders include Friedrich Hayek, Frank Knight, Karl Popper, Ludwig von Mises, George Stigler and Milton Friedman. More info here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mont_Pelerin_Society

  • Related to Scroogenomics, Tony Gill wrote an article called “Gift Giving Is Better for Society than Economists Think” and you can read it here https://www.aier.org/article/gift-giving-is-better-for-society-than-economists-think/

  • Gift giving creates deadweight loss. Yes. But if the economy is so efficient why is gift giving persistent for so long? This is the root of Tony Gill’s argument discussed on the show today.

Segment two:

  • You have to overcome a burden of trust in order to successfully trade. One of the ways we do this is by giving up a resource up front. Some would call this gifting which is really important for building trust in society.

  • Why do stores decorate for Christmas? They want to be a part of the community and are willing to invest resources to show their commitment. This could even be true of business owners who do not celebrate.

  • Sumptuary laws (taxes) are seen a lot throughout history. They are taxes on consumption above and beyond what is considered necessary such as fancy clothes or expensive food. Tony asks, “Is Wokeness the New Sumptuary Laws?” at this link: https://www.aier.org/article/is-wokeness-the-new-sumptuary-laws/

  • At a certain level of Patreon membership - Patreon.com/TSOE - you can get a shout out like Blake Oliver did! Check out Blake’s podcast and earn CPE credits for listening. https://earmarkcpe.com/

Segment three:

  • Inequality has been ubiquitous throughout society and is usually examined at a national level. Where you tend to see it at a much more salient level is locally…in your neighborhood and at your job, for example.

  • Paraphrasing from Tony today: While studying inequality at the national level can be helpful, rarely do we stop and look at people in their local neighborhoods and determine what they are doing to solve common problems.

  • “No, the Business Roundtable Did Not Repudiate Capitalism” from Tony Gill was discussed today during segment three. Tony mentioned that he is rethinking it a little bit but you’ll need to listen to the show for the details. https://www.aier.org/article/no-the-business-roundtable-did-not-repudiate-capitalism/

Segment four:

The bots are coming for us!

For a few weeks now, we have been experimenting with a new feature from Otter.ai. Many of you will know that some of the current AI solutions have caught Ron and Ed’s attention during the bonus episodes. We let Otter.ai loose on the audio version of this show and here is what it (he? she? they?) came up with:

  • Copyright claim on every episode. 2:33

  • Welcome to the show. 7:02

  • Anthony Gill’s bio. 8:43

  • What is the Mont Pelerin Society and how did it start? 14:36

  • Why do we give a diamond engagement ring? 21:00

  • Gift-giving as a way to generate discussion. 23:54

  • What are the sumptuary laws and how does Wokeness fit into that? 30:30

  • Anthony Gill’s thoughts on inequality in the US. 37:32

  • Where do you see inequality at the local level? 40:02

  • Trade is about human interaction and relations. 46:11

  • The role that religion is playing in the war in Ukraine. 51:54

  • We need to engage with people before transactions. 58:28

Episode #416: Interview with James Geraghty

Ron and Ed welcomed to the show James Geraghty. As a biotechnology executive, Jim has been a passionate participant in the orphan drug revolution since its inception. We talked about his book, Inside the Orphan Drug Revolution, The Promise of Patient-Centered Biotechnology, which is in part a history, with eye-witness accounts of advances as they occurred and portraits of the pioneering scientists and physicians, tireless activists, and visionary business leaders who made the revolution happen. And it tells deeply personal stories of patients and parents willing to risk new, untried therapies.

Use these show notes to follow along with the audio…(scroll a bit further to see what a bot came up with)

Segment one:

Segment two:

  • Abbey Meyers is considered the mother of the orphan drug revolution. She is referenced in Jim’s book and also on the FDA website at this link: https://www.fda.gov/industry/fdas-rare-disease-day/story-behind-orphan-drug-act

  • The 1983 Orphan Drug Act completely changed the face of therapeutics for rare disorders. By 1990 FDA had designated 370 products for orphan status, and of these 49 were approved for orphan indications.

  • Initially, President Reagan was going to veto the Orphan Drug Act of 1983. He was not in favor of government intervention. Mothers who knew Nancy Reagan worked in the background to help President Regan see the benefits. Ultimately, he signed.

  • Every year there are hundreds of drugs passed for orphan diseases. Patients today who benefit are in the millions. This has been a global revolution with patients who benefit all around the world.

Segment three:

  • Ceradase was the initial orphan drug developed by Genzyme. In the initial trial of 7 patients, 6 showed no improvement. “That’s an anecdotal case and you can’t build a company on it.” Well, they did. And it worked.

  • Our understanding of genetics continues to explode in large part due to the human genome project. Science has come to understand DNA and RNA and much of our understanding about mRNA was developed in the pursuit of treating rare diseases.

  • In the context of orphan drug development, “N of 1” is an important concept. An N of 1 trial is a clinical trial in which a single patient is the entire trial. They are a single case study.

  • Can we get to a point where the FDA can approve a broad platform and then patients can be treated as individuals who have ultra-orphan diseases? Jim certainly hopes so although we are not there yet.

Segment four:

  • International rare disease day is on February 28th. This is closely tied to Jim’s book, “Inside the Orphan Drug Revolution”. Learn more at this link: https://www.rarediseaseday.org/ @rarediseaseday

  • Even in countries with universal health insurance, they have other ways to block orphan drug treatments and make it difficult to obtain for those in need.

  • A big THANK YOU to Jim Geraghty for joining us today to discuss his book! “Inside the Orphan Drug Revolution” is available at this link: https://www.amazon.com/Inside-Orphan-Drug-Revolution-Patient-Centered/dp/1621824683

The bots are coming for us!

For a few weeks now, we have been experimenting with a new feature from Otter.ai. Many of you will know that some of the current AI solutions have caught Ron and Ed’s attention during the bonus episodes. We let Otter.ai loose on the audio version of this show and here is what it (he? she? they?) came up with:

  • Casa Bonita updates. 0:00

  • Why didn’t Trey Parker invest in that? 2:21

  • Cannibal the Musical –. 3:20

  • Introduction to James Garrity and his book. 8:19

  • What is an “orphan drug”? 13:00

  • Drug pricing as a problem for patients. 18:30

  • Jim’s favorite story from the book. 21:40

  • The Orphan Drug Act of 83. 27:03

  • What is the term “n=1”? 31:44

  • How the FDA is understaffed and underfunded. 36:33

  • N equals one technology and pandemic preparedness. 41:25

  • What is an ultra-orphan disease? 45:51

  • How do we make these things affordable for all of these patients? 49:09

  • Jim talks about the challenges of orphan drug access in the developing world. 52:53

  • What is the full-loaded cost of gene therapy? 57:04

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention. 

This past week was bonus episode 416 - It's all about payments. Here are some links discussed:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #415: Stack of Stuff

It’s a stack of stuff. Despite the weekly bonus episodes in which Ron and Ed go through their stack, things can build up over time. What better way to talk through the Twitter ownership change and how morticians are putting the fun in funerals?

Use these show notes to follow along with the audio…(scroll a bit further to see what a bot came up with)

Segment one:

Segment two:

Segment three:

  • Ed shared a great article from the WSJ today. It’s called, “How Morticians are Putting the Fun in Funerals” and it very much feels like the start of a subscription funeral. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-funeral-industry-plots-a-rebrand-were-fun-11667486178

  • 1/2 We did a show called “Generational Astrology”. It’s episode number 142 and is linked here: https://www.thesoulofenterprise.com/142

  • 2/2 As a follow up to that show, Ron has been thinking a lot about Ronald Reagan’s book, “The Creative Society”. It is a series of speeches Reagan gave starting in the late 50s until the time he was elected Governor of California.

  • “Some people describe the early days of my administration as a honeymoon. If it was a honeymoon, I was sleeping alone.” —President Ronald Reagan

  • Permacrisis: The Collins Dictionary word of the year (with a full list of the others at the link) https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/woty

Segment four:

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention. 

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits.