Episode #281: Free-Rider Friday, February 2020

What happens when there is just TOO MUCH news to talk about. We free-ride off of the best, most timely topics.

Let’s start off with Ed’s topics:

 Here are Ron’s topics:

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Here are some of the topics and links Ron and Ed discussed during the bonus episode this past week:

Episode #280: Subscription Pricing, Part III

What a show! The subscription pricing business model continues to evolve as do our thoughts on the topic.

Here are just a few of the topics and links we helped use to drive the conversation during Part III of our Subscription Pricing discussion.

  • Futurist Dan Burrus distinguishes between hard and soft trends. The Subscription Business Model is a hard trend, and every business is going to have to grapple with it, whether they adopt it or not.

  • Tien Tzuo dropped a “time bomb” on television—and the NFL—in his February 8, 2020 newsletter, titled “2022: The Last Year of Television?”

  • You can see the decline in ESPN subscribers here.

  • During segment two and three of the show, we had on previous guest, Justin Lake, @jlaketx (see Episode #245). We discussed how his business is adopting subscription-based pricing.

  • Subscription pricing comes to architecture, at Schimberg Group Architects, calling it “concierge architecture.”

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Here are some of the topics and links Ron and Ed discussed during the bonus episode this past week:

Episode #279: Subscription Pricing in Law Firms Featuring Matthew Burgess

Is subscription pricing having an impact on the legal profession? Based on our guest — Matthew Burgess — the answer is a resounding YES!

Let’s Start with Matthew’s Biography:
Matthew Burgess co-founded View Legal in 2014, having been a partner and lawyer at one of Australia’s leading independent law firms for over 17 years. Matthew’s passion is helping clients to successfully achieve their goals. Matthew specialises in tax, estate and succession planning, providing strategic advice to business owners and high net worth individuals, and recognised in the ‘Best Lawyers’ list since 2014 in relation to trusts and estates and in ‘Doyles’ either personally or as part of View since 2015 in relation to taxation. In 2017 he was also nominated as Tax Partner of the Year (Lawyers Weekly). In part leveraging off the skills he has developed working in the SME market space, Matthew has been the catalyst in developing a number of innovative legal products for advisers and their clients. As an author, Matthew is widely recognised as an expert in his field, who constantly creates bespoke revenue related strategies for the growth, management and protection of wealth. Matthew is regularly published in Australia’s leading monthly tax journal, The Tax Institute’s Taxation in Australia (11 articles since 2012) and the leading weekly tax journal, Thomson Reuters’ Weekly Tax Bulletin (20 articles since 2012). He is the author of 23 books, and is a Practicing Fellow at VeraSage Institute.

Here are Ed’s Questions from the Episode:

  • You have an interesting LinkedIn profile, going all the way back to grade school. Give us the Matthew Burgess background story.

  • While you were at Big Law, you read The Firm of the Future and you said it was a two-year journey, what was that process like? Was it a sudden realization, or just over time that you concluded this 18-hours billable per day was nuts?

  • So did you try to change it inside the firm for a while?

  • Was that the build-up over time, or was there one incident that was the coup de grâce for you?

  • Talk to us about the transition, did you have a plan for creating your own firm?

  • You founded View Legal in August 2014. Were you solo or did you have a couple of partners?

  • Before we move on to talk about subscription, I wanted to ask you about one more bullet point under “Our Approach,” since it involves my experience in project management in the IT space, having to do with quality:

    • Old View: Quality is defined by the law firm

    • View Legal: Quality is defined by the customer

  • There are a lot of lawyers, and other professionals, who have a big problem with that one?

  • You were well ahead of even Ron and myself and other thinkers at VeraSage on this whole notion of subscription. One of the things I heard at VeraSage Down Under when I did my presentation on subscription pricing was that it could not work in law. What does subscription mean to you, and how is that different from pure value-based pricing?

  • What other adjustments did you need to make it sustainable for both you and your customers?

  • The whole notion of allowing your price to justify your expenditure of costs in the future, this allowed you to create, from a technological perspective, a better experience for those customers coming on?

  • We might have to combine subscription with something Ron has talked about for years, the TIP Clause.

  • If you to break your revenue down by percentage of subscription vs. standard fixed pricing, can you give me a percentage on that?

  • It’s a dual-gated model, the movie theater popcorn situation?

  • If you look at other industries, such as Amazon Prime, or other subscription models that are out there, are there any that you look to that you’re using to base your future on?

Here are Ron’s Questions for Matthew Burgess:

  • Your “Why” [Purpose] at View Legal is laid out on your website under “Our Approach.” Describe how you came to your Why:

    • “At View Legal our mantra is to build the firm our friends would choose.”

  • Also, “OUR VISION”:

    • “To achieve our vision, we have set out to fundamentally and radically revolutionise access to high quality legal advice, in our areas of deep specialisation – structuring, tax, trusts, asset protection, business sales, estate and succession planning.”

  • In a table below the Vision, you contrast the “Old View” of law firms with that of View Legal, with “significant inspiration provided by VeraSage. Partly adapted with permission of George Beaton, Beaton Capital, 2014.” We could spend the rest of the show on this table, but I just want to ask you about a few of the items.

    • Old View: Bill clients on hourly rates (or various, increasingly elaborate, permutations on the theme) and have no particular interest in client perception of value

    • View Legal: Customers provided up front ‘SPS Guarantee’ – that is service and price satisfaction is Guaranteed with all work undertaken following upfront fixed pricing

  • Explain how the guarantee works and what impact it has had on your customers.

  • When the trigger is pulled by a customer, and you do have to compensate the customer, one of the benefits is you get to fix the underlying problem that happened. Has that been your experience?

  • Having that guarantee does make you more selective about who you take on, doesn’t it?

  • Another item:

    • Old View: Revenue growth the #1 goal

    • View Legal: Exceeding customer expectations #1 goal

  • Another one on this table I just love, since diversity is such a hot topic right now in the professional firm space, you contrast:

    • Old View: Constant focus on the ‘need for diversity’ of gender

    • View Legal: Only focus on diversity of thought

  • And I love this one:

    • Old View: Intellectual property is how we make money and should be guarded jealously

    • View Legal: Intellectual property is how we create trust and should be shared freely

    • From Ron: I love that philosophy because I think Paul Arden wrote this in one of his books: I give away all of my intellectual capital because that forces me to replenish it.

  • View Legal participates in B1G1, 1.2 million+ impacts on your website, as of this morning. Our VeraSage colleague Paul Dunn is involved with B1G1. Describe that, and how it is seen by your customers, team members?

  • You’ve written 23 books. How many of those are children books?

  • One of those books, which I just loved, is The Dream Enabler (2014). Ed and I are going to do a show on inequality, and you point out in there that the most common problem faced by high net wealth families is alcoholism? Is that true?

  • You cite the rule “rags to rags in three generations:”

    • 1st generation makes the money

    • 2nd generation holds or keeps the money

    • 3rd generation loses the money

  • And you quote Warren Buffett: “A very rich person should leave their kids enough to do anything, but not enough to do nothing.” How do you think about inequality? Does it trouble you?

  • You also sent me a copy of your Best Ever 101 Lawyer Jokes [2015], and I love the Warning on the cover: “Content May be Considered Offensive (Particularly by lawyers!).” My favorite joke in there is: How many lawyer jokes are there? And people will inevitably respond with, “Millions, infinite.” No, there’s just one, the rest are true stories. 

Need more information?
This was a GREAT episode, no doubt. We also have another episode on a law firm that uses subscription pricing, #274.

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

The bonus episode after Matthew Burgess featured……..Matthew Burgess! He was able to stay on with us for an additional hour and it was just as great as the first hour.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about bonus pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #278: Memorable Mentors — Clayton Christensen

We paid tribute to Clayton Christensen as a Memorable Mentor in this episode. Buckle up because his contributions were vast and made a big impact.

Clayton Christensen, R.I.P. [April 6, 1952 – January 23, 2020 (67)]

From Wikipedia:

After graduating from high school in 1970, Christensen matriculated at Brigham Young University (BYU). While at BYU, he took a two-year leave of absence from 1971 to 1973 to serve as a volunteer full-time missionary for the LDS Church. He was assigned to serve in South Korea and became a fluent speaker of Korean. Christensen returned to BYU after completing his missionary service, and in 1975 graduated with an Honors B.A. summa cum laude in economics. Upon graduating, he won a Rhodes Scholarship and spent two years studying applied econometrics at Oxford, receiving an M.Phil. in 1977. Christensen then returned to the United States and moved to Harvard University to pursue an MBA at HBS, which he earned with high distinction in 1979.  He was a professor since 1992 at HBS. He’s survived by his wife, Christine, and 5 children.

His eldest son, stands 6 ft 10 in tall and played college basketball at Duke University, where he was a member of Duke's 2001 National Championship team.

He wrote: Why I Belong, and Why I believe, about his Latter-day Saint faith, and also: The Power of Everyday Missionaries: The What and How of Sharing the Gospel.

In the spring 2010 he had been diagnosed with follicular lymphoma, a cancer similar to that which had killed my father. Immediately after starting to write his book, How Will You Measure Your Life?, with his cancer in remission, he suffered a stroke, and had to learn to speak again, one word at a time.   

Here are some of Ron’s favorite concepts from Clayton:

  • “You should not have an opinion, the theory should have an opinion.”

  • “A good theory doesn’t change its mind. It allows you to categorize, explain, and predict Trying to predict the future by collecting data is like driving a car only looking in the rear-view mirror.”

  • “Conclusive data is available only about the past. If you want to peer into the future, you need a theory.”

  • The appeal of easy answers—strapping on wings and feathers—is incredibly alluring. Ostriches have wings and feathers, can’t fly. Bats have wings, no feathers, great fliers. Flying squirrels have neither.

  • Look for the anomalies in your theories.

  • Investors need to be patient for growth but impatient for profit. Capital that seeks growth before profits is bad capital. Both types occur.  When a good strategy has been found, investors need to change: impatient for growth and patient for profit.

  • Culture in any organization is formed through repetition—it’s like an autopilot, you have to program it.

Here are the books by Clayton we discussed:

The Innovators Dilemma, 1997

  • Andy Grove stood up with a copy at COMDEX “most important he’d read in a decade.”

  • A true disruptive innovation, appealed only to a niche market, appeared less attractive to the incumbent it eventually usurped.

  • Steve Jobs regularly quoted the book, so did George Gilder.

  • The Economist named it one of the six best business books ever published.

Competing Against Luck, 2016

  • This is all about the "Jobs to be Done" theory of creating value.

  • I'm still processing it for professional knowledge firms, as it seems to be more focused on products than knowledge work.

  • I think it's a useful framework, and I'm trying to reconcile with Pine and Gilmore's The Experience Economy value curve, where the top is transformations.

  • Given Christensen definition of a "job" is customer progress, I think they might be talking about the same things. In summary, a job is defined as:

    • A progress that an individual seeks in the given circumstance.

    • Provides a solution where there are formerly inadequate or non-existent solutions;

    • It is more than simply being functional – there are important/emotional dimensions that are often more important than the functional aspects.

    • The cure in the flow of daily life. This is the key aspect – it is not about the characteristic of the customer, product attributes or new technology or trends.

    • Ongoing – it is not about a selling event.

  • The question then becomes, which language is more persuasive. I like transformations (or legacy) rather than jobs, at least for knowledge work.

The Prosperity Paradox, 2019

  • Alleviating poverty is not the same as creating prosperity. We can’t end poverty by focusing on poverty. I was bit surprised by how this book never just says that wealth is the only known antidote to poverty, and how poverty needs no explanation, it’s the natural condition of mankind. What needs explaining is wealth.

  • This book does explain how to create that wealth, by creating market-creating innovations that are sustainable. I believe Deirdre McCloskey, George Gilder, Michael Novak, among others, offer a better theory of how and why innovation occurs (McCloskey’s focus on rhetoric and Gilder’s on an information theory of capitalism, which is the most innovative theory I’ve ever read), at the macro level.

  • This book is more at the micro level, but it’s still a worthwhile contribution. I only wish it would have built a stronger moral and ethical case for free markets.

  • Extreme poverty has decreased from 35.3% in 1990 to 9.6% 2015, 730 million from China alone, 66.6% in 1990 to less than 2%. Yet in Sub-Saharan Africa poverty actually increased, from 1990, 282 million (55% of population), to 2013, 401 million (42% of population).

  • Since 1960, $4.3 trillion spent on developmental assistance in poor countries. Name one that’s developed because of aid? Not one, which I was also surprised the author’s never delved into.

  • I’ve always appreciated Clayton Christensen’s attachment to the importance of theory—there’s nothing more practical than a good theory! He’s also very precise in the words he uses, and in defining his terms, such as:

    • Prosperity: The process by which more and more people in a region improve their economic, social, and political well-being. A country can be rich, but not prosperous (e.g., the resource curse).

    • Innovation: A change in the processes by which an organization transforms labor, capital, materials, and information into products and services of greater value. They create jobs, profits, and change culture (innovation is not the same as invention, something new. Innovations are usually borrowed country to country).

  • Three types of innovation: Sustaining, efficiency, and market-creating

    • 1. Sustaining: improvements to existing solutions on the market. Substitutive in character (Lipton Tea flavors, Camry best-selling Toyota), but don’t represent major growth in economy. Most innovations are sustaining in nature.

    • 2. Efficiency: Do more with fewer resources, usually process innovations. Tend not to create jobs (resource extraction, fracking, fewer inputs, greater output). Both Sustaining and Efficiency free up cash for future investments.

    • 3. Market-creating: create new markets that serve people for whom either no products existed or existing products were neither affordable nor accessible for a variety of reasons.

  • There’s not just one strategy (theory) for development. Japan, South Korea ($200 per capita income 1950s, $27,000 today; high suicide rate, 2.5 times OECD average; highest hospitalization for mental illness), Singapore (60 years ago, 1/5 GDP of sub-Saharan Africa’s), Taiwan, Hong Kong, all developed in different paths, but the common denominator was market-creating innovation.

  • The authors point out that Mexico has been mostly efficiency and sustaining innovations, but a serious lack of market-creating innovations.

  • There are a lot of examples of entrepreneurs who are making a dent in these poor countries with market-creating, from mobile phone networks, electronic payments and banking, health care, food, flooring, and many others.

    • Ultimately, market creating innovators Identify opportunities where there seemed to be no customers. It is difficult to run your ruler over things you can't see. Often, you will not be competing with any existing product, rather you are competing against apathy or nonconsumption.

  • They also deal with infrastructure, which is more a medium for moving value rather than creating it, and corruption. Corruption, like poverty, needs no explanation. What needs to be explained is why some countries have less of it than others.

  • Entrepreneurs are good at identifying nonconsumption, which is the authors’ theory for market-creating innovations. They conclude that “We can solve this problem. Not because we’re eternal optimists, but because we have done it before.”

  • I agree, there’s simply no excuse since we have a much better understanding of how wealth is created. But the focus on the “root causes of poverty” persist, which has always amazed me. What would we do if we learned the “root causes” of poverty? Create more of it?

  • Ultimately, the book recommends a reframing of the problem for developing countries focused on the following five principles, namely:

    • Every nation has a potential for extraordinary growth within it – this is referred to as nonconsumption.

    • Most products on the market today have the potential to creating growth markets when they make them more affordable.

    • A market creating innovation is more than just a product or service. It is a whole system that often pulls in new infrastructure and regulations and it has the capability of creating jobs.

    • Focus on pulling, not pushing to solve problems.

    • With nonconsumption, scaling becomes inexpensive. Once the opportunity is identified in nonconsumption, a business model can be conceived to make a product or service available to a large population of non-consumers, and from there scaling is relatively inexpensive.

  • But the poverty bureaucracy is entrenched, as the great movie Poverty, Inc. explains. Perhaps this book will get more entrepreneurs to innovate rather than simply providing charity. I hope so.

How Will You Measure Your Life?, 2012, Clayton Christensen, James Allworth, Karen Dillon

  • How can I be sure that I will be successful and happy in my career? My relationships with my spouse, my children, and my extended family and close friends become an enduring source of happiness? I live a life of integrity—and stay out of jail? (Jeffrey Skilling I knew of from our years at HBS was a good man).

    • “There are no quick fixes for the fundamental problems of life. I can offer you tools that I’ll call theories in this book. If I had tried to tell Andy Grove what he should think about the microprocessor business, he would have eviscerated my argument. Instead of telling him what to think, I taught him how to think.”

  • Incentives are not the same as motivation.

  • “Is this work meaningful to me? Is this job going to give me a chance to develop? Am I going to learn new things? Will I have an opportunity for recognition and achievement? Am I going to be given responsibility? These are the things that will truly motivate you.”

  • “You have to balance the pursuit of aspirations and goals with taking advantage of unanticipated opportunities. An emergent strategy.”

  • “I’ve had three careers: first as a consultant, then as an entrepreneur and manager, and now as an academic—none of which I planned.”

  • In his Staying out of jail chapter he quotes C.S. Lewis

    • “The safest road to Hell is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts. “

  • “God, in contrast to us, doesn’t need tools of statisticians and accountants. No need to aggregate. His only measure of achievement is the individual.

  • “The only metrics that truly matter to my life are the individuals whom I have been able to help, one by one.”

Here are a few other resources regarding Christensen:

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Here are some of the topics and links Ron and Ed discussed during the bonus episode this past week:

Episode #277: Free-Rider Friday, January 2020

Why does every Free-Rider Friday just FLY BY! This was a great show with LOTS of topics covered. Click play above to listen and use the show notes below to help guide you along.

Ed’s Topics For Free-Rider Friday

Ron’s Topics For Free-Rider Friday

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Here are some of the links Ron and Ed discussed during the bonus episode this past week:

Episode #276: More Metric Mania

Episode #276: More Metric Mania!

What you can measure you can manage. Tying metrics to strategy has become critical in business, and this can create all sorts of moral hazards. An article from the September-October 2019 issue of Harvard Business Review explored some of these hazards in “Don’t Let Metrics Undermine Your Business,” by Michael Harris and Bill Tayler. Ed and Ron dig into this article and continue a long-standing conversation about metrics. Below are a few key points. Click play above to listen to the episode.

  • Strategy is abstract: metrics give it form. Strategy is blueprint: metrics are concrete, wood, drywall, bricks

  • Trap: focusing on the metrics that represent the strategy.

Wells Fargo opened 3.5M deposit and CC accounts without customer consent—cross-selling strategy (“Eight is great”). This scandal led to the following costs:

  • Initial fines ($185M)

  • Reimburse customers: $6.1M

  • Class-action lawsuit: $142M

  • 2017, accrued $3.25B for future litigation expenses

  • 2018, Fine by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) $1B, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)

  • CEO Timothy Sloan resigned March 2019

Wells Fargo Bank never had a cross-selling strategy—it had a cross-selling metric! Its strategy was to build long-term relationships but it was hijacked by numbers.

The authors describe this as surrogation: mentally replace a strategy with metrics. They lay out three strategies for reducing surrogation:

  1. Get people responsible for implementing strategy to help formulate it

  2. Loosen the link between metrics and incentives/compensations

  3. Use multiple metrics—no single metric captures the strategy


 
“As long as measurements are abused as a tool of control, measuring will remain the weakest area in a manager’s performance.”
— Peter Drucker
 

Ed and Ron also answered the following email question from Jean:

Ron & Ed -

As a fan of your podcast, I thought I would reach out with my question. I co-founded a firm 3 years ago to provide accounting as a service. We target small & mid-size companies who need all the skill sets of a larger company accounting department without all the people. We are growing and would like to add profit sharing and/or bonus to our compensation.  I am interested in metrics that other firms use for measuring profitability in general and for compensation. Do you have any recommendations?

Regards, 

Jean

[See our Episode #243: Team Member Compensation for Ed’s formula on profit-sharing]

Other books and resources mentioned during the show include:

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Here are the books Ron and Ed discussed during the bonus episode this past week:

Episode #275: The Top 10 Books We Read In 2019

Did you read a good book in 2019? Ed and Ron sure did!

We read some GREAT books in 2019 and we went over them in detail during our show this past week. Click the audio link above to listen.

“I think we ought to read only the kind of books that wound and stab us. If the book we are reading doesn’t wake us up with a blow on the head, what are we reading it for.”
— Franz Kafka
“A good book is the best of friends, the same today and forever.”
— Ancient Chinese Cookie Proverb

Here we are! Starting with Ed’s top 5:

…and shifting to Ron’s top 5:

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Here are the books Ron and Ed discussed during the bonus episode this past week:

Episode #274: Subscription-Based Law Firm — Jon Tobin, Counsel for Creators

Certainly Lawyers Cannot Use The Subscription Business Model, Until They Can!

About Our Guest:
Jon Tobin is a graduate of the UCLA School of Law, where he studied intellectual property, business law and international law under the nation’s top-ranked practitioners. While at UCLA Law he served as one of two editors-in-chief of the UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs. Before studying law he worked for years as a designer and software developer, so he knows what it means to work in creative industries and how things actually get done. He deals with matters involving copyrights, trademarks, software, design, licensing, business, art law and contracts. Jonathan speaks and writes regularly about legal issues facing technology and creative ventures and has given talks for the American Institute of Graphic Arts, the California Community Foundation, UCLA Law, and at a variety of design and technology conferences. Admitted to practice in California and before the federal court of the Central District of California.

Ron and Ed touched on a wide range of topics about Jon’s business model over the course of the hour-long show. Here are Ron’s questions:

  • Tell us about your history. You moved from a career in technology to law, and then saw how to combine them?

  • Did you ever work in a large firm before you started your firm?

  • You wrote a great article at Attorney at Work, “We Built an Affordable Subscription-Based Law Firm for Creatives,” where you discussed when you started practicing, you tried many things—seminars, consultations, etc.—but then landed on the subscription plans for businesses and created The Creators’ Legal Program. Where did you learn about the subscription model?

  • This model puts the relationship at the heart of the business doesn’t it?

  • Before we get into your pricing, one of the questions you must get from your colleagues is “How do you make money like this? What if people keep calling your, or camp out in your office? How do you answer their objections?

  • You set a $95 per month price level; it’s very reasonable, and it’s quite a constraint. That forced you to do some very innovative things, didn’t it?

  • You developed your own system to handle the volume of subscriptions. Did you develop your own applications, or were you able to buy program off-the-shelf?

  • You’re specialized—creative people/industries (writers, artists, app developers, clothing companies, architects). This is a great niche because it’s growing. Talk about how you market to them.

  • It’s easier to do subscription if you’re niched as opposed to a general practitioner, isn’t it?

  • Pricers have a saying: Innovate for growth and price for profit. In your article, you discussed adding additional services over time, such as live Q&A, free trademark services, and some services you’ve taken away. Talk about the process you use to decide what to keep and what to remove?

  • If one of your customers comes to you with a service that’s not covered by the subscription, how do you price for all the other services lawyers do?

  • What about litigation? [No chance!]

  • Could you see how it would be possible to do litigation under this model?

  • When you decide to provide the noncovered service for free, you’re pricing the relationship and not the services. You’re investing in the relationship and building lifetime value.

  • You also discussed metrics and KPIs. The subscription model demands different metrics/KPIs—they are future directed, not backward looking. You are obsessed with:

    • Lifetime customer value

    • Net Promoter Score

    • Churn rate

  • Are there any others you’ve found valuable?

  • Do you find that 20% of your customers utilize 80% of your resources, and many others are paying for that peace of mind?

  • Have you found other things you can provide to those who underutilize your services?

  • You wrote you want to move from hundreds of members to tens of thousands. How scalable is this model, Jon?

  • What advice would you give to a legal firm wanting to convert, or experiment, with this model?

 …and here are Ed’s questions:

  • Explain your customer in-take process? Do people come to you with an event, or do they just want access to a lawyer?

  • You have four services listed on your website, are the other three services included if you join the subscription service?

  • Have people come to you with an event, join, discuss the issue with you, and then leave?

  • You flipped the model, charging for the consultation rather than giving it away in order ot get the services.

  • Have you found that you don’t need a large customer base, or are you looking for a larger customer base given your price point?

  • Are you comfortable at the level you’re at, or do you and your partner have plans to expand

  • You’ll stay in your niche, and build additional services for creative people?

  • When you refer customers to other firms outside of your niche, do you get referral fees?

  • Are you trying to develop relationships with other firms that practice within this model?

  • Have you given any thought to offering different levels to your subscription pricing?

  • Options would allow you to innovate for growth.

  • What were some of the unintended benefits you found in practicing this way?

  • How long have you been around, when did you start your firm? [March 2013, brought partner on 2016, subscription revenue became significant part of the revenue around 2018].

  • I notice you have a blog on your website. Do you provide those posts to your members before they go public?

  • Let’s talk about one of your posts, “What Does California AB5 Do?” Give us the background of this law.

  • What should businesses do because of AB5?

  • The provisions that affect Uber and Lyft are delayed until 2023, is that right?

  • One of the articles you wrote talks about LegalZoom (“LegalZoom Alternative: Businesses Search for the Ultimate One”). What are your thoughts on LegalZoom?

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #273: 2019 — The Year in Review

Ed and Ron looked back at 2019 and discussed their favorite TSOE shows, guests, and discussed notable people we lost during the year.

RIP: Gone, but not forgotten

  • Tim Conway, Conway died on May 14 at the age of 85.

  • Don Imus, 79, Dec 27th.

  • Georgia Engel, The Mary Tyler Moore Show star died on April 12, her talent agent Jackie Stander confirmed to PEOPLE. She was 70. Also on Everybody Loves Raymond.

  • Katherine Helmond, Helmond, who famously portrayed mother Mona Robinson in ABC’s Who’s The Boss? for eight years and Jessica Tate on Soap, died on Feb. 23 of complications from Alzheimer’s disease at her home in Los Angeles. Also on Everybody Loves Raymond.

  • Doris Day died on May 13. She was 97.

  • Ken Kercheval, Kercheval, the actor best known for his longtime role as Texas businessman Cliff Barnes on the CBS soap opera Dallas, died on April 21. He was 83.

  • Carol Channing, the saucer-eyed, gravelly voiced Broadway barnstormer whose offbeat personality and marquee value fueled such Golden Age musicals as Gentleman Prefer Blondes and Hello, Dolly!, died on Jan. 15, her publicist B Harlan Boll confirmed in a statement to PEOPLE. She was 97.

  • Peter Tork, Peter Tork, the blues and folk musician who shot to stardom in 1966 as a member of the Monkees, died on Feb. 21. He was 77.

  • Daryl Dragon, Daryl “Captain” Dragon — half of the legendary 1970s pop duo Captain & Tennille — died on Jan. 2, 76.

  • Denise Nickerson, The actress, best known for playing the gum-chewing Violet Beauregarde in 1971’s Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, died on July 10. She was 62.

  • Beverley Owen, Owen, best known for playing the original Marilyn Munster on season 1 of The Munsters, died in late February. She was 81. Her costar Butch Patrick, who played Eddie Munster, announced the news on Facebook on Feb. 24, writing: “Beautiful Beverly Owen has left us. What a sweet soul. I had the biggest crush on her. RIP Bev and thanks for your 13 memorable Marilyn Munster episodes.”

  • Herb Kelleher, 87.

  • David Koch: The billionaire industrialist and philanthropist died on Aug. 23 at 79 after “many years of fighting various illnesses,” according to his obituary. Koch had assets worth nearly $50 billion.

  • T. Boone Pickens, 91.

  • Ross Perot, 89.

  • Lee Iacocca, 94.

  • John C. Bogle, 89, Mutual Fund Giant.

  • Henry Bloch, 96.

  • John Paul Stevens, The former Supreme Court Justice died on July 16. He was 99. Stevens, who was appointed by President Gerald Ford in 1975, 

  • Gloria Vanderbilt, CNN’s Anderson Cooper confirmed the death of his mother — the heiress, socialite and fashion icon Gloria Vanderbilt — on the network on June 17. She was 95.

  • Paul Volcker, 92.

  • John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat and the longest-serving member of Congress in U.S. history — who in recent years delighted his 264,000 followers on Twitter with biting commentary and wit — died on Feb. 7 at home in Dearborn. He was 92.

  • Carol Spinney, Big Bird, 85.

  • Ken Baker, Ron’s Brother, R.I.P.


Our Top 5 Favorite Shows with Guests

  1. Episode #257: Third Interview with George Gilder Sep 10, 2019

  2. Episode #262: Survivor’s Obligation — Interview with Chris Stricklin Oct 15, 2019

  3. Episode #263: Interview with Andy Armanino Oct 21, 2019

  4. Episode #267: The REALLY REAL Second Interview with Rory Sutherland Nov 19, 2019

  5. Episode #226: A Priest and a Rabbi... Jan 28, 2019

Our Top 5 Favorite Shows on Topics

  1. Episode #255: The Soul of Silicon Aug 26, 2019

  2. Episode #252: On Rory Sutherland's Book - Alchemy Aug 5, 2019

  3. Episode #233: Pricing at Starbucks March 18, 2019

  4. Episode #250: INFLUXUS RECIPROCI FALSUM Jul 22, 2019

  5. Episode #225: The Real Monopolies: Occupational Licensure Jan 21, 2019

Our Top 5 Most Popular Shows from the Audience

  1. Interview with Joe Woodard

  2. Lost Chapter of Implementing Value Pricing

  3. How to Fire a Customer

  4. Lawyering Up

  5. Interview with Tien Tzuo

 

Ron’s Podcast List

  • Uncommon Knowledge, Peter Robinson

  • Free Thoughts

  • The Tom Woods Show

  • Conversations with Bill Kristol

  • EconTalk

  • Conversations with Tyler [Cowen]

  • Hayek Program Podcast

  • Planet Money NPR

  • NPR On Point

  • Cato Events Podcast

  • The Remnant [Jonah Goldberg]

  • Rabbi Daniel Lapin Podcast

  • Reason Podcast

  • The Editors (NR)

  • Mad Dogs and Englishmen

  • Conversations with Nick

  • The SoHo Forum Debates

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #272: Free-Rider Friday, December 2019

Our Last Free-Rider Friday of the Decade is Now Available! (…and our first LIVE show of the year this coming Friday)

We had a great conversation and talked through quite a few topics in the grand tradition of Free-Riding with the news. Here are Ron’s links from the show:

Here are Ed’s links from the show:

Don’t forget that you can subscribe to The Soul of Enterprise in your favorite podcast player so that you never miss an episode.

Episode #271: Interview with Dr. Keith Smith, Co-Founder, The Surgery Center of Oklahoma

This was an unbelievable show with eye-opening insight into medical pricing practices!

g-keith-smith-md.jpg

Dr. G. Keith Smith is a board certified anesthesiologist in private practice since 1990. In 1997, he co-founded The Surgery Center of Oklahoma (SCO), an outpatient surgery center in Oklahoma City. SCO is owned by over 50 of the top physicians and surgeons in central Oklahoma. Dr. Smith serves as the medical director, CEO, and managing partner while maintaining an active anesthesia practice.

The free-market focus of the Surgery Center, the innovator of this free market model in the U.S., has gained the endorsement of policymakers and legislators. Dr. Smith hopes as many facilities as possible will adopt a transparent pricing model, a move he believes will lower costs for all and improve the quality of care. Dr. Smith is also the co-founder of the Free Market Medical Association. The association provides a platform where buyers, both individuals, and employers, who are seeking high quality, affordable healthcare can find free-market minded sellers, both physicians, and facilities.

Dr. G. Keith Smith is a board-certified anesthesiologist in private practice since 1990. The Surgery Center of Oklahoma is owned by over 50 of the top physicians and surgeons in central Oklahoma. Dr. Smith serves as the medical director, CEO and managing partner while maintaining an active anesthesia practice.

Here are Ed’s questions from the show:

  • Share the origin story of The Surgery Center of Oklahoma.

  • You mentioned in your podcast with Russ Roberts that you have about 300 companies that engage with you with self-insurance. Are they small or large companies?

  • Do you fear that government intervention might come along someday and make what you do illegal, or a full-on single payer system?

  • Do Americans really pay the most for healthcare, or is it all these shadow prices that appear on the Explanation of Benefits form?

  • Do you think your model could be Uberized, an app that could connect people who need surgeries with physicians? [Yes, check out the Free Market Medical Association, FMMA.org, shop health tab].

Here are Ron’s questions from the show:

  • In 1977, the Bates case was decided by the Supreme Court, based on a law firm that published prices, [which opened up advertising for professional firms]. I’ve got to imagine that you’ve drawn arrows because prices are published front-and-center on your website?

    • [The only organization that copied Dr. Smith’s website, without permission, is UCLA].

  • Your Website shows a Hip replacement = $15,499 (Hernia = $3060), and it’s all in, isn’t it?

  • How can you do it so cheaply, or a better question, why are others charging so much?

  • You haven’t raised base prices in 20 years, is that right?

  • And the fascinating thing is your Surgeons make more than any other facility?

  • You can’t just compete on price, but also quality. Because your prices are so low, quality is even more salient? How do you convey your quality? With metrics: infections (yours was 0% in a prior year), readmissions, etc.?

  • You said in the EconTalk episode: “If something doesn’t go well, we don’t make more money?” Explain how you handle surgeon errors.

  • You gave another example of a guy who had a Hernia operation, the guy goes back to work and lifts, destroys repair, and you waived price and had him just pay the costs of supplies.

  • You also reduce the surgeon’s fee when they mis-diagnose a patient?

  • What about the poor who can’t even afford your low prices. As you say, at current prices, we’re all poor!

Here are a few additional resources that we touched on during the show:

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

For this bonus show we were fortunate enough to continue our conversation with Dr. Keith Smith. Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #270: Communist Humor

Karl Marx wrote that “The final phase of a historic political system is comedy.”

Did the telling of jokes tumble the old Soviet system?

George Orwell wrote that “Every joke is a tiny revolution.” Jokes were the communist system’s jazz, the music of the oppressed. Jokes eased psychological pain; helped forge trust between contemporaries; helped make sense of their lives. Join Ed and Ron for a rollicking look at Communist Humor, and some of the better jokes that were told during its reign.

Listen now by using the audio link above!

Episode #269 — The Subscription Model in Medicine

What happens when a smart doctor recognizes that there is a better way?

Is it possible for family physician to operate under a subscription-based business model, priced below what you pay for your mobile phone service? What about services not covered by the subscription? Could those be priced with full certainty and transparency?

Dr. Paul Thomas MD Plum Health.jpg

For episode 269, we had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Paul Thomas, founder of Plum Health DPC. Dr. Paul Thomas is a board-certified family medicine physician practicing in Corktown, Detroit. His practice is Plum Health DPC, a Direct Primary Care service that is the first of its kind in Detroit and Wayne County. His mission is to deliver affordable, accessible health care services in Detroit and beyond. He has been featured on WDIV-TV Channel 4, WXYZ Channel 7, Crain's Detroit Business and CBS Radio. He has been a speaker at TEDxDetroit. He is a graduate of Wayne State University School of Medicine and now a Clinical Assistant Professor. Finally, he is an author of the book Direct Primary Care: The Cure for Our Broken Healthcare System.

Below are show notes and questions we asked our guest. Use these to help guide you along when listening to the podcast (embedded above).

Ed’s Questions

  • What is Direct Primary Care?

  • Based on an interview I saw you do, there’s no wait time for patients?

  • Why did you go this route—Direct Primary Care?

  • You were burned out in your residency. What was the moment that you said I can’t do what most people are signing up to do?

  • Most time patients do get with their doctors is spent with the doctor typing and facing a screen.

  • What are some of things that are covered in your clinic?

  • What you are capable of doing in your practice is probably 80-90% of what a healthy patient would need in a given year?

  • It would cost me personally about $840 in your practice. If you’re so cheap, why is healthcare so expensive?

  • It’s said America pays more than the average OECD country, but there’s no price transparency in the system, which inflates those prices, correct?

  • What are some of the barriers you see that are still in the way of physicians getting into DPC and patients being able to access DPC?

  • When you did start, did you consider other pricing models? Yours is based on age, but did you consider, for example, response times, or different services you would include and exclude?

  • Do you have any jumpers, and by that I mean people who pay for a month and then leave, then come back six months later?

  • You’re now also offering rates to small businesses in your area?

  • And the companies pay your membership as part of the employees benefit package?

  • You believe that patients should also have a catastrophic health insurance plan?

  • We don’t expect our auto insurance to pay for gasoline but we do expect our health insurance to pay for a blood test. It’s absurd?

  • I was struck that in your TedX talk you used the phrase “living my truth,” take us through that, what does that phrase mean to you? 

Ron’s Questions

  • In your book, Direct Primary Care: The Cure for Our Broken Healthcare System, you cite a 2016 study performed by Medscape found 51% of physicians experience burnout. Burnout is defined as a loss of enthusiasm for work, feelings of cynicism, and a low sense of personal accomplishment. You felt this in your residency. How long did it take you to work up to 500 patients?

  • How did you market your practice, was it social media, word-of-mouth, press. I know you did a Tedx talk.

  • I know DPC is in the same family of Concierge Medicine, which has the reputation of being just for the elite, which isn’t true. But the DPC prices are usually less than a mobile phone bill.

  • On the cover of your book there’s a picture of you trying to catch sand through your hands. Can you explain that analogy?

  • You talk about technology and how there’s too much borrowing from Henry Ford’s assembly line, treating customers like commodities rather than human interaction. It’s not very efficient to sit and listen to your patient read you poetry. It is, however, highly effective. Would you agree with that?

  • You also talk how the average of GP doctors have 2,400 patients. Do you think this DPC model will alleviate this GP doctor shortage?

  • You talk about the growth of urgent care centers in the US is a symptom of a failed primary care system.

  • Do you feel that people who are not licensed could do some of the work now being done by physicians? What’s your view of occupational licensing and how it folds into this model/

  • You mentioned to Ed that insurance companies try to get as many dollars passing through the hands. They don’t seem to like the concierge or DPC models, not because they compete with actuarial based insurance but because they compete with pre-paid medical care. Did Michigan pass a law that made it clear that DPC is not an insurance product?

  • Just seems to be like insurance companies would like to block this model. Is that a fair statement?

  • There’s obviously some education going on with doctors with respect to DPC, but we also need to re-educate patients to see you even when they are healthy, not just when they are sick. Has that been an educational process to get patients to see you even when they don’t have an issue?

  • We talk a lot about the market share myth, that growth for the sake of the growth is the ideology of the cancer cell, not a sustainable, profitable business. You phrase it in your book as “Value over volume.” You must be asked a lot that healthcare is different than any other product or service we buy, how do you explain to people that it can be priced like other things we buy

  • Your model is restoring the sacred relationship between the patient and doctor. You’re bringing this back to the days of Marcus Welby.

  • I’ve read that most calls (82%) are received during normal business hours, that patients don’t abuse your time off. Has that been your experience unless there’s been an emergency?

  • Tell us about your new venture, www.startupdpc.com.

  • If you could wave a magic wand to reform healthcare, what would you do? [Price transparency and quality scores was Dr. Paul’s answer].

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Here are some links from our bonus show this week. The bonus show, all bonus links, and additional bonus material are available to our Patreon subscribers. Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

So what did we discuss during the most recent bonus show?

Episode Reprise — Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Presents for the Holidays

Scroogenomics - Why You Shouldn't Buy Presents
Ron Baker and Ed Kless

[Editor’s Note: Some things are just too good not to share again. While our most ardent listeners are familiar with Episode #22, Scroogenomics, many may not be familiar with this specific show. This past Friday was Black Friday in the United States which means it’s time - once again - to talk about why you shouldn’t buy presents. Bah, humbug!!!]

Today, on Black Friday, and right before Cyber Monday—the biggest shopping days of the year—Ed and I thought it would be fun to discuss the interesting, funny, and thought-provoking book by Joel Waldfogel: Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Presents for the Holidays.

The author makes the case that the deadweight loss to the economy from gift giving, in 2007, totaled $12 billion, out of approximately $66.5 Billion spent (about 12%). Citizens Against Government Waste would classify Christmas as a wasteful government program.

Gift giving severs link between buying decision and item’s value to its user—the transaction actually destroys value. To add insult to injury, we are obliged to pretend to be grateful!

His complaint is not the level of spending or the consumption, but the waste.

We discussed the four ways you can spend money in the economy:

 

Former Congressman Dick Armey pointed out how difficult spending is in Category II (Gift), let alone Category IV (Government):

Every year, I worry and fret select the right birthday gift for my wife, Susan. Every year, try as I might, I manage to choose the wrong thing. If I can’t figure the needs and desires of the one person who is closest to me in the world and who I deeply love and care for, how can we expect the government to do a better job?

Three groups spend other people’s money: children, thieves, politicians. All three need parental supervision.

Hierarchy of value of gift giving

  • Aunts & uncles & grandparents = 75%

  • Parents = 97%

  • Friends =91%

  • Siblings =99%

  • Significant others = 102%

Further, we spend approximately 2.8 billion hours shopping in December. To put that number in context, the old USSR—before it imploded—spent 35 billion hours annually standing in line for everyday products and services.

Infographic from Deloitte’s 2018 annual holiday survey

Economist Ian Ayres said this about Waldfogel’s book:

Joel Waldfogel is one of the smartest and funniest economists on the planet. I think of him every time I start to unwrap a present. Buy Scroogenomics for your friends and family. It makes the perfect Christmas gift.

Episode #268: Free-Rider Friday, November 2019

Our Best Free-Rider Friday Yet!!!

Well, that’s our opinion anyway. It was a great show and flew by as usual with topics ranging from LASIK eye surgery to The Shining to the Pope. The show notes are below and the audio link above is ready for you to hit the play button!

Here Are Ron’s Topics:

Hi Ron, Ed,

Recently I've been wondering about the best progression for those in a pricing career. 

Being fairly new to the field myself, and without it being a very established profession (especially here in Australia), it's hard to know what the path 'should' look like, particularly regarding education/qualifications.

I'd be really interested to hear your thoughts on traditional education (e.g. university degree) versus self-paced learning/learning by experience - what do you think are the essential educational/training activities someone in pricing should have?

I have heard the former is more suitable if you're expecting a career in a corporate environment, as opposed to running your own business. 

To give a little context, I'm currently studying a business degree, but am starting to see why many consultants skipped this/find their degree isn't as useful to them as a business owner.

Really keen to hear your thoughts on this!

Cheers,

Courtney


Here Are Ed’s Topics:


Bonus Content is Available As Well!

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Here are some links from our bonus show this week. The bonus show, all bonus links, and additional bonus material are available to our Patreon subscribers. Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

So what did we discuss during the Free-Rider Friday bonus show?


Episode #267: The REALLY REAL Second Interview with Rory Sutherland

Episode #267: The REALLY REAL Second Interview with Rory Sutherland

We are excited to welcome back on the show Rory Sutherland, Vice Chairman, Ogilvy in the UK. Rory has delivered several TED talks, along with many others, including our favorite, a Zeitgeist talk he delivered to Google. They are all incredibly thought-provoking, and rooted in behavioral, and Austrian, economics. In his spare time, Rory collects self-aggrandizing job titles.

Episode #265: A Discussion with A Millennial — Tom Hall

Episode #265: A Discussion with A Millennial — Tom Hall

Do You Want a Nuanced, Younger Perspective on the Billable Hour? Tom Hall, a millennial (we say that tongue-in-cheek) from the UK, is studying economics and political science at the University of Bristol, UK. He produced a report on the billable hour and timesheets. He sent us a list of questions, which were excellent, so we are happy to have the chance to speak with him about his findings.

Episode #264: Free-Rider Friday, October 2019

Episode #264: Free-Rider Friday, October 2019

In the glorious tradition of afternoon naps and Taco Tuesday, we are fast approaching the last Friday of the month which can only mean one thing…Free-Rider Friday! As many know, our typical show is “topic” driven. We dive deep into one subject for the length of the show, usually with a guest or two. Free-Rider Fridays are designed to be “event” driven, whatever issues are in the news that we (or you) find worthy of commentary.

Episode #263: Interview with Andy Armanino

It’s Not Often that We Have the Honor of Interviewing Someone with Andy’s Experience

What follows is a full transcript of our interview with Andy Armanino. Here is a link to Armanino LLC as well as the Armanino Foundation.


Ron Baker  0:32

Welcome to the soul of enterprise business in the knowledge economy, sponsored by Sage energizing Business Builders around the world to the imagination of our people and the power of technology. I'm Ron Baker, along with my good friend and various agents, attitude colleague, Ed Kless. On today's show, folks, we're honored to interview my former boss and Andy Armanino. Andy, welcome to the soul of enterprise.

 

Andy Armanino  0:56

Thanks, Ron. Nice to be with you, too.

 

Ron Baker  1:00

You started your career with Arthur Young and then joined Armanino in 1989, the firm that your dad built [in 1969] becoming the youngest partner and then in 2005, you took over as managing partner. But before we get to you Andy, I'd love to learn more about your dad because this is the fiftieth year anniversary of the founding of the firm and that's a milestone. And I read somewhere that you describe your dad as a “strong but kind leader.” Tell us about your dad.

 

Andy Armanino  1:31

I'm not sure as a kid growing up I would have described him as a strong but kind dad. You know how things go as people age they become mellower and mellower. My kids and all my dad's grandkids would say he is the kindest, gentlest man you could ever imagine. My recollection as a kid was yeah, he was kind but he wasn't always as gentle. But he definitely installed a number of things in his kids. And that was do right. Do good, work hard, and what you do matters. And for him, he actually was a guy that went to work for the big eight back in time after graduating with an accounting degree. He spent about five years at the big firm becoming a manager. And like a lot of people, he got to the point where it was painful to be at the bigger firm because he couldn't serve clients the way he felt like he wanted to. He wanted to have a unique relationship with clients where he felt like what he did mattered to their business and their lives. And so he left the big eight with his best friend Tom Jones, and they started a little teeny firm with the two of them. They set out some simple goals to do things right. Like I talked about how you have a unique relationship with the client and be good to their people at first that was very simple because their people was the two of them. They set a goal of growing one person per year. And I actually joined them about 20 years after their start, exactly 20 years after their start, and there were 22 people when I joined. So they checked the box, they grew 20 people in 20 years and they hit their goal.

 

Ron Baker  3:28 

Wow, that's great. Your dad he’s still alive isn't he?

 

Andy Armanino  3:33 

He is. He lives in a little beach community of Capitola. And I actually really appreciate the chance to talk about him because he is now just a wonderful example of a human being after he retired at a relatively young age of 54. He's given back to his community. He shows up and feeds the homeless in his community two days a week and he basically has been a one-man crew at his church holding it together the last number of years. But he's tried to give back and do good basically every day since he's retired from this line of work. So he's been a great example not only in business, but how to live your life.

 

Ron Baker  4:15 

He must be incredibly proud of what you did. And what Matt continues to do with the firm.

 

Andy Armanino  4:23 

Yeah, he is, we're, we're lucky we have a unique relationship while he's dad, he's also a great friend. And for me, he happened to be, when people ask the question who influenced your business life, and there's a lot of people over the years, but by far and away the number one person who influenced how I kind of approach business, my thoughts about how we were going to do things, was my father, I was lucky we got to have a relationship that from a work standpoint could have gone one of two ways, my friends when I came to work, said, two camps, you're crazy, it's going to be miserable. You have a great relationship with your dad, you're going to ruin it. Or the other camp was, hey, you and your dad do have a great relationship and this is going to be the best thing that ever happened. And for me, it ended up being the best thing that ever happened. He was a wonderful, wonderful mentor from the business standpoint.

 

Ron Baker  5:22 

And I don't mean to jump ahead, but you brought it up that he retired at the age of 54. And you retired at the end of last year, 2018, and you're around the same age, was that the inspiration, you were following in your dad's footsteps?

 

Andy Armanino  5:42 

So I wouldn't necessarily say it was his footsteps. We were about the same age, I beat him to retirement by a few months is what I tell him. But what I've always believed in, what he believed in, and what I learned from him because he did it really well is I believe in youth, I believe in supporting the up-and-coming leaders in our practice. I believe that people, when unleashed can do far more than we ever think they can do. I got that opportunity at a young age. And was I ready to do some of the things the firm asked me to do. At the time, I said, Yes. In hindsight, with a little more wisdom, I'd say, No, I wasn't ready. But you know what, I figured it out. And I believe our people are the same. They are unbelievable. Their potential is unbelievable. And for me, I tried to stay very relevant and very innovative. Even up till the end, and there's a lot of people that said, God, you could keep going, you're an innovator. And what I realized is if I kept going, it doesn't allow the space and room for others to expand where they could. And I think that's what the firm's experiencing. So I always knew I would leave at a relatively young age because of my belief in in youth and supporting that upward flow of ideas and energy.

 

Ron Baker  7:10 

And Andy, just so our listeners know, I know you would expect the managing partner, the son of the founder, to say those things. But I've been with Armanino since April of last year. And one of the reasons I joined is you do have an innovative and a young partner culture, and they are entrepreneurial. And they are incredibly innovative, and they are wickedly smart. It's just unbelievable how you're able to develop this talent. And I've just been so impressed. And you know, Andy, you and I have had really frank discussions and we've had our debates and our disagreements. So I hope you know, I'm not blowing smoke up your skirt, I truly mean that.

 

Andy Armanino  7:52 

I appreciate that. And I think you have a unique perspective, at least for this interview, because you've seen some of what we've done. And for me, I know I get the most excited, I think about all the different things that we've done at Armanino and all the things that we've accomplished and the growth and some of the rewards we received and some of the comments that peers make. And the thing I get the most excited about is when I get a chance to work with our young people. It's one of the reasons that we formed something called the SAB [Staff Advisory Board], which I don't know if we'll touch on at all, but the staff advisory board way back in time, which is an interesting story on how that happened. And then a manager advisory board [MAB] and those two boards have real voice for young people, both the staff level and manager level to have impact on the direction of our business. And when I'm working with them, it's good days. Very good days. As you’ve seen Ron, you know, partners are, you know, some days are wonderful to work with partners, some days, it's not wonderful. So, you know, I like working with our young people and some of those days working with partners, I don't miss.

 

Ron Baker  8:58 

I totally get that and because I've had some interaction with both of those groups, the SAB and the MAB. And what really impresses me is the firm the partners give authority to these people to lead initiatives. I'm working on one right now, with members of the management team. And it's phenomenal because it's a big initiative, and it would have a big impact on the firm. And to be able to have that type of autonomy at that level I think is fairly unique.

 

Andy Armanino  9:29 

Well, I don't know if we'll have time or not, and you let me know, the story of the SAB and the concept behind it, how it was formed. I think your listeners would find it interesting.

 

Ron Baker  9:41 

Go ahead and talk about that Andy, we have a few minutes before the break.

 

Andy Armanino  9:45 

Okay, just let me know when to cut me off here. So I heard a speaker back in time years ago, her name was Rebecca Ryan, very interesting person. At the time, she was a young person that was about six foot with red hair on stage and right away told everyone that she was a lesbian. And this is an audience of a bunch of managing partners. And when she looked out, she said, you guys, I see a lot of wrinkles, gray and white. And so she really endeared herself to her audience from the get go. I thought she was wonderful. She brought up a concept of empowerment. And one idea that she touched on is she asked a question, how many of you have a board of your young people, your staff, people or your managers, where you actually listen to them and hear their ideas, and not a single hand in the room went up. And it was a large meeting of managing partners. After the session, I went up to Rebecca and introduced myself and said, Rebecca, we're going to do it at Armanino, and she looked at me and she said, Andy, it's nice to meet you, but you won't because I’ve spoken to this group in your profession a long time, and you know, people shake their heads, but they don't put some of the things in action. This accounting profession is amazing at the lack of change that happens. And I said, Rebecca, we're going to do it. And we did, we went back and we actually had a process that we put in place where you had to raise your hand if you were a staff person if you wanted to participate. And then you had to be elected by your peers. And the first group was a group of about 12 people that got elected from all of our different disciplines, and offices at the time. And I actually was their executive sponsor. And in the very first meeting, I asked the group, what's wrong with our firm? And at first, they were very shy, managing partners and CEO in front of them and they don't want to tell me what's wrong. And pretty soon someone said something and then the juices started flowing. And I had a bunch of whiteboards in the room and my hand got tired of writing the things that were wrong. Then I said, Guys, this isn't going to end up as a session that we're just going to complain. Now it's your job to prioritize, pick the three items that you want to work on changing, and you're going to be empowered to change them. And that's how we started 10 plus years ago, and it's evolved since then. But it is an amazing group of people and a powerful lesson for them in early leadership. And you get to watch these people solve problems that most partners would say they can't solve, but guess what, they can.

 

Ron Baker  12:31 

Yeah, there's a great book, you've probably read it. It's from the Dean of Oracle University, and it's called Rookie Smarts. And the argument is to put rookies in charge of initiatives, and they tend to be on the young side because they bring fresh thinking, they do look at things from a different angle, but they'll still consult the experts as. And I think that's what's so powerful about this. It's just a great initiative. Well Andy, this is great, unfortunately we're up against our first break and folks we'd like to remind you if you want to get ahold of Ed or myself, send us an email to asktsoe@eraSage.com. We will post full show notes at thesoulofenterprise.com of our interview with Andy and where you can learn more about him, in the meantime, we want to hear from our sponsors.

 

Ed Kless  15:35 

Our guest today is Andy Armanino now the retired managing partner of the Armanino firm. And Andy, first of all nice to officially meet you sort of on the radio here and I'm glad to get a chance to talk to you today. But my first question is all that stuff you were talking about with Ron, why did you make this hiring mistake?

 

 

 

Andy Armanino  16:00 

I mean, I get a good chuckle because you obviously know Ron. You know, I actually can't remember, Ron might, but I can't remember the first time I heard Ron speak but one thing my brother [who's the current CEO at Armanino] always says about me is I love hearing from and working with really intelligent people. So I'll compliment Ron a little bit. And you know, his presentation made me think, and clearly Ron was a very bright guy and had some different ideas. I have never been afraid of different ideas. Matter of fact, I love being challenged on things and so Ron and I have had some great debates about a variety of topics and certainly it wasn't a mistake because I think Ron's helped move our practice forward.

 

Ed Kless  17:00 

Well, to steal a line, I think Ron knows the actual author of this, but if you think it's difficult arguing with Ron, try agreeing with him.

 

Andy Armanino  17:10 

I've experienced both.

 

Ed Kless  17:15 

But to that, and I did want to ask you about this and just pick up a little bit on the story that where you became the 22nd employee, and that was right on target with what your dad was trying to do with the firm. Obviously, there were some significant changes, and you went through a period of pretty explosive growth. And I wanted to talk to you about that, from the people side of things. What were some of the things that you put in place to make sure that you did get the right people, the right hires? And clearly you have because you talk so highly of them in this interview, so I want to know what is it about your hiring process or culture that makes you able to stick to that and get those great people?

 

Andy Armanino  17:54 

Yeah, and I think you hit a key word there is culture and I'll come back to that. But for me, it was when I got to the firm, the firm had a really wonderful culture for a small firm, very hands on. My dad and his partner, founding partner, Tom Jones, did exactly what they said they would do, they created an environment where they were having impact on clients lives. In fact, when my dad retired, we threw a party and the speakers were mainly clients, and it almost put tears in your eyes in what an impact that he had had on their business. So right in line with what they want, and the other piece of that was having a great place for people to work at. And at the time, it was a family environment as we grew, and I learned a lot, those initial years coming from the big eight, where that feel was not the same feel. It was very much you know, if you're good, you're going to keep moving, if not get out of the way. So I learned a lot about our culture and what it meant to be part of our Armanino. I think that culture continued to evolve as we grew.

 

We stressed the idea of people having voice, of being innovative and to be innovative, you have to hear different things. And you have to be willing to challenge your different beliefs to make yourself better. And so we've done that. And I think what happened is, not only were we growing rapidly doing good things, but we're also good marketers, and I'll be very honest about that. I hired back in time one of the first marketing directors in an accounting firm, most accounting firms didn't do it. Marketing was a bad word. It wasn't to us and we hired a marketing director who at the time was a rare breed in the profession. She was very good at what she did. And she helped us to advance to be one of the best if not the best marketing in our profession, and so not only were we doing good things and creating a culture, but we were getting the word out there, and it allowed us to attract a talent base that firms our size just could not do.

 

Ed Kless  20:13 

And so what it from a hiring standpoint, though, was there any type of process that you guys put in place to make sure that you are getting the right hires? Did you take a while for hiring, just described that for me?

 

Andy Armanino  20:28  

Yeah. And if I'm real honest, it is. At first it was very haphazard. If you look at our process today, it's very formalized. One of the things we did back in time as we were growing, and we had this concept that we were going to be more than a core accounting firm, meaning we were going to do more than the compliance audit work which is important in our profession and, and it's something today that's still important at Armanino but we're going to be more than that. We're going to be more than a compliance tax firm. And so as we branch out into other areas what we didn't try to do is hire accountants or CPA is to do jobs that they weren't really trained to do. What we did is as we built our consulting practice is we hired really good consultants. And we were fortunate again to have this culture in this growth engine. And we were doing really well. So people wanted to be part of it. So we had a lot of diversity. In our hiring practices, we look for diverse ways of thinking. The other thing I will say that we did, fairly early on, from a not really a formal standpoint, but something that was very important to us is that most accounting firms kind of look at grades, especially for their young people. How well did the people do in terms of GPA at their college? Well, that's important. I mean, it shows that people are intelligent and they're willing to work hard, but it doesn't tell the whole story. One of the things that we did is we focused on communication skills, can this person talk in an interview? Do they have a personality? do their eyes light up with a spark when you're talking to them that clients are going to see? And will they be a good teammate? Things like that. So we did that from a very early stage. And it's certainly become more formalized over the years.

 

Ed Kless  22:22 

And then, of course, you started to become one of my favorite word's: acquisitive,  and to take on other firms and bring them in under the Armanino name. What did you look for when acquiring firms, because that's a whole other ball of wax. And oftentimes, they don't quite go as well as there's not a great track record in the accounting profession for mergers and acquisitions to be long term successful.

 

Andy Armanino  22:48 

Yeah, I agree with you there. I mean, there's a bumpy road out there in the merger & acquisition, past and future in our profession. It still continues at a rapid pace. I think for us, we were very disciplined, meaning that we knew culturally what we wanted to be, and what we were and what we wanted to be going forward. And so we looked at kind of concentric circles, we looked at a firm that was in a great geography, we wanted to be in very strong economies. So that was one factor, Hey, is the firm that we're looking at in a location that is a very strong economy, and what are their people like in every deal that we did every deal that I did, we required the other firm to let us get beyond the partner group into their managers, and sometimes below to talk to people to see what their people are like, are they inquisitive? Are they people who are going to have the same mindset about growth that we did? That was the other circle. And then the last circle that was hugely important, was the cultural circle and did the firm have a cultural mindset like we did. And if we could find one that had an intersection of those three circles, then it was a yeah, let's go. And let's go and let's go fast. If we found a firm that was in two of those three, you know, it was a possibility for us. If we found one that was one or less it was we're not looking at this. And one of the things that happened for us was that there are many firms out there that spend a lot of time seeking out acquisition targets. We really didn't, we actually got approached by firms that knew about what we were doing and asked, you know, if we would consider having them join us, so that was an interesting dynamic as well.

 

Ed Kless  24:43 

So you did say no to people then?

 

Andy Armanino  24:46 

Yes. We said no. So several times over the years, and continue to do so today.

 

Ed Kless  24:53 

Yeah, if you can't, if you're not going to say no, your yes means nothing, right? Agreed. And what about now, despite all that, despite all of the great work that you did on being careful, and due diligence and making sure that there was a culture fit, there's still going to be things that are going to be challenging when you have a merger or acquisition type situation come in. What are some of the things that you try to do to make that go as smoothly as possible even on those ones that were like, hey, let's move fast on this.

 

Andy Armanino  25:22 

Yeah. And, and I'm not going to tell any stories have we had bumps in our process? And the answer’s yes. One deal that I worked on, years and years and years ago, we probably weren't as disciplined as when we had our circles. And you know what, sometimes I was younger. Sometimes you fall in love with a deal. And I've heard this from many M&A people, is never fall in love with a deal. And I think I fell in love with the concept of doing this deal. And it wasn't a good a fit. And what we found is it takes a long time to fix those mistakes. And we did. And we put a lot of energy and effort in, but it's not simple. I can tell you another quick story when we did a significant size deal in Los Angeles, and the concentric circles were all there. But it was outside of our area. It was the first kind of big leap outside of the immediate Bay Area. And so what we did is we rented an apartment down there, a three bedroom apartment, and four of us and our C suite made a commitment that we would be there. One of us would be there all the time for the first six months, that we were together with this firm. So each one of us lived in in the apartment for part of that six months. But it had a huge impact having one of our leaders working with them day to day, through some of their struggles and in hearing the concerns that people had and there were lots but it allowed us to handle them and address them on a real time basis. That that is a learning game. That I think that the firm would repeat again if it did a substantial deal.

 

Ed Kless  27:04 

Sure, that's great stuff. Well, we're up against our next break. We want to remind you that you can get in touch with Ron or me by sending an email to asktoe@verasage.com. Of course, the website is thesoulofenterprise.com where you can go and listen to all of our previous 260 shows as well as previews to upcoming shows. But right now, a word from our sponsor.

 

Ron Baker  29:26 

Well, Welcome back, everybody. We're here with Andy Armanino, one of the top 100 Most Influential People in the profession, and a whole lot of other accolades. Andy, I want to go to a 30,000 foot level with you and ask you, What do you think is the most important issue that's currently facing the profession?

 

Andy Armanino  29:48 

So I would say two things right now, and one's going to be very obvious. It's what most people would say, but the rapid change right now in technology and the impact that's having on our clients’ businesses and our businesses. Hand in hand with my second item, which is my fear at times for the profession is we tend to have a fixed mindset about things that we've done things a certain way and they've been successful. The professions have had a lot of success, which sometimes is an anchor, instead of this growth mindset, and I'm reading an interesting book right now on the next stage of the growth mindset. But I think the profession needs to adopt a growth mindset, and it needs to embrace technology instead of fighting it.

 

Ron Baker  30:47 

And on the tech, Andy, are you optimistic or pessimistic? We did an interview with Daniel Susskind, who's one of the co-authors of The Future of the Professions and he's kind of fatalistic about the number of jobs it's going to knock out of even the professions, including CPAs, do you see it being a compliment or a substitute?

 

Andy Armanino  31:08 

So I know Daniel, and he and I have had that discussion. I'm the opposite of Daniel. I'm very optimistic about the potential again, if this profession, and it won't be all, there will be some firms that don't adapt and don't have a growth mindset, and they will go the way of the dodo bird, they won't exist. The firm's that do adopt the growth mindset, I think what will happen is, they will view these changes in technology with some excitement. They'll look at it on what it can do for their clients. They'll have a new tool, a number of tools, a number of new tools in the tool belt to serve their client, and they'll adapt their internal practices to take advantage of technology as well. So I think there will be firms out there that are doing this. And I think they're going to evolve to a place where they're driving more value than they ever could have imagined to their client base. And I think it raises another question that you and I have talked about is making sure then that they capture that value that they're providing their client base.

 

Ron Baker  32:22 

Right, I think some of this change to technology, and you know, technology is just sucking hours out of the system. And it's really driving the move to value pricing, largely because you can't have a business model that says we sell hours if those hours are decreasing.

 

Andy Armanino  32:39 

So just real quick, I know it's a side note, but I was just in Rome at a world meeting for Moore Global and I got to talk to managing partners from across the world. And one of the sessions we did was on value pricing. And one of the partners came up to me afterwards and said, Hey, we're adopting some of this, but the problem is we're making changes to technology today. And what's happening is we're doing some of our compliance work faster and faster. And all it's doing is driving the amount I bill lower. And I just almost want to shake him and say, Come on. You've got to be smarter than that. We have to now capture that value that we're providing with the use of technology. We spend an awful lot of money investing in technology in this profession. I know our Armanino spends a huge dollar amount on technology and we need to capture that value that that we're investing in as a firm and make sure that our clients appreciate it.

 

Ron Baker  33:45 

Absolutely. And I'm like you, I'm on the opposite side of Daniel on this, I've got future glee as Ed likes to say, because I think all this technology takes away that predictable and rote work and allows us to move up the value curve with our clients.

 

Andy Armanino  34:02 

I agree, I do think there will be, I hate using the term, but there'll be roadkill along the way. Because, again, I get a chance to get out and talk to an awful lot of people in firms in this profession. And I'm excited about the number of firms that are now listening to some of the new ideas, embracing some of the new ways of thinking and really wanting to change. But I'm also disappointed at the number of firms that, that have this fixed mindset that they say, hey, we've been successful. We've heard all this change-up for years and years. And you know what, it hasn't happened and I can keep doing what I'm doing for the next X number of years. And that's all I want to do. Well those firms will not be successful in the future.

 

Ron Baker  34:50 

Yeah, I agree. One thing I do love that Daniel wrote in the book is what kills you doesn't look like you. And we do have threats facing us from outside the profession. And that's where major disruption can happen.

 

Andy Armanino  35:06 

Yeah, I absolutely agree. And I think one great exercise that every firm out there could do and not just every firm but every business. And we've done it at Armanino and it's something that needs to be updated, not on an infrequent basis. But if you get some smart people around the table, and I would encourage people to have a diverse, smart group of people around the table. And I might come back to that because the book I'm reading deals exactly with that topic, but a diverse group of smart people and think about how would we disrupt this business? How would we kill ourselves? And if you'll come up with some interesting ways that you can disrupt this profession in your own firm, it's got to cause you to think on how to address some of those issues that you raise. And certainly some of those issues that you raise will not be from traditional competitors.

 

Ron Baker  36:01 

I do love that exercise. And a corollary to that is the old Peter Drucker question of, if you weren't in this line of business, would you enter it today? And if not, what are you going to do about it? It seems, Andy, that once we get into something will never exit it, will never abandon it. And Drucker thought that you needed a corporate abandonment policy. So you could move on to other things. What's your take on that?

 

Andy Armanino  36:31 

Yeah. And, man, I love the concept. I was fortunate enough to go to a program at Harvard three times, I must have flunked a couple of times, but a leadership program I've gone to three different times and I'll probably go a fourth in a bit because I enjoy it so much. But one of the cases that we studied is the Netflix case. And it's a wonderful case study, all of you who haven't read that it'd be worth ordering from Harvard. About how Netflix, a successful company who had disrupted their industry, primarily blockbuster, decided to disrupt themselves for the future. And they've been wildly successful, but it takes guts to disrupt yourself when you have something that's working because you recognize that we need to be different in the future. And it's something I know when I get a chance to talk to leaders here at Armanino, I stress it and I know current leadership here stresses it, is we can't fall in love with what we're doing today. Because it's working. We have to still say, will this work in the future? And do we need to do some things differently in the future that will add more value to our client base?

 

Ron Baker  37:43 

Yeah, I've been saying this ever since I've had the chance. Every time I have the chance to talk to somebody in the firm, I say the old Andy Grove line. If you're going to be cannibalized, it's better to dine with friends. And I love that because if we don't obsolete ourselves, there's somebody out there who will do it for us and it’s better to control our own destiny, create our own future.

 

Andy Armanino  38:05 

And I very much believe in that.

 

 

Ron Baker  38:08 

Yeah, it was announced a little while ago that you're going to become the chairman of Moore Global as of January 1. And I think that's great because it gives you a worldwide perch to view the profession. Do you see similar challenges in the global firms that we have here in the US?

 

Andy Armanino  38:29 

Yeah. So just for background real quick, Moore Global is a network slash association that allows firms to collaborate, share ideas, create a platform and a marketplace for some of the unique ideas that are being created today, and serve their clients on an international basis. And Moore Global is one of the larger organizations in the world that does this, about $3 billion, over $3 billion in firm revenue, and I've been involved for a number of years. Leading North America, the North American board recently agreed to lead the global board. And your question is an absolute Yes. As much as I get frustrated at times with some of the lack of speed and the change of North American firms around the rest of the world, we are rabbits and they're the tortoise. Yeah, it could be a significant issue.

 

Ron Baker  39:32 

Yeah. Well, I'm glad that you're stepping in as chairman because maybe you'll bring the same innovative spirit and entrepreneurial spirit that you brought here in the US so that's fantastic. And congratulations on that.

 

Unknown Speaker  39:44 

Thank you. I promise change for them.

 

Ron Baker  39:47 

Oh good. Andy, what are you most proud of during your time as chairman of Armanino?

 

Andy Armanino  39:55 

So I get that question a lot in. It's almost you know, I think of so many different things here. It is I think of faces, I think of clients that I got to work with over the years and have impact on their business. I think for me, my largest client that I kept as managing partner and CEO was the Catholic Church that I got a chance to do so many different things to help an organization that needs a lot of help. And I think the, the faces of those people, I think of internally, some of the young people here that I've just had an opportunity to sit and talk to share, share ideas, share stories, and you know, you can call that mentoring, you can call it whatever you want, but I've had the opportunity to work with so many of them that later became partners in this firm or went on to great success at other places, which is great, too. So I think about all that. And then the last one I think about is my dad and Tom when they founded the firm kind of had these two pillars, by having this unique relationship with clients that I've mentioned, and have a firm that is really good to its people. I got a chance to add a third leg to that stool and that's through the Armanino Foundation. And that's being good to your community. And what I'm most proud about in the Armanino foundation is the amount of people here that support the foundation, typical charitable foundations, corporate foundations, if you get 25% participation out of your employee base, it's really good. We set the goal to do that in year one. And we did and we far surpassed that now. And so it's meaningful to our people to do good things in our community. And that's great to see.

 

Ron Baker  41:50 

That's awesome. Andy, real quick, I have to ask you, because I know you are an inveterate reader and you and I used to talk about books all the time, but what's your favorite non- business book.

 

Andy Armanino  42:04 

Non business just for fun. Oh man, I love the Lord of the Rings series.

 

Ron Baker  42:13 

Well, that's awesome. Well, Andy Ed’s going to take you home in the next segment, but I just wanted to take the opportunity to thank you so much for coming on The Soul of Enterprise. It's way overdue. And congratulations on chairman of Moore Global and best of luck, and I hope you come back on.

 

Andy Armanino  42:29 

Thanks, Ron.

 

Ron Baker  42:31 

Alright, well, folks I'd like to remind you, if you want to contact Ed or myself, send us an email to asktsoe@verasage.com. And now we want to hear from our sponsor, Sage.

 

Ed Kless  44:45 

Well, once again, we are back with Andy Armanino and Ron this hour goes by quick especially we have such great guests like Andy on I can't believe that we're 45 minutes in already. But Andy, I wanted to ask you a little bit about the implementation of value pricing at Armanino. I know I joked about the hiring mistake but in all seriousness what led you to say, hey listen, we really have got to do this and we’ve got to start doing this now.

 

Andy Armanino  45:11 

So as I mentioned I listened to Ron some years ago and we developed a relationship after that first time I heard him and we had him back to one of our rallies (we don't call them retreats, we call them rallies, I didn't like the term retreat because it implies going backwards now forward). But we had Ron at our rally and you know, it was one of the most popular subjects that we had ever talked about at our rally. And what it told me is it was the right time to start thinking about doing this on a firm-wide basis. And what we thought is we were going to really struggle to do it. What we bought in for the most part in there are always hurdles and I can talk about some of those hurdles, but in general because we have had this firm that is used to change and used to doing some things different. And I told Ron this, we are the right firm for Ron to come and help us put in place some of the ideas that he's had for years and years in this profession. And so that's why we brought him in to help with this. I think it is so logical to say, how do we go have a different kind of discussion with our client about our relationship and the value they perceive in that relationship? And then for us, how do we capture that value the right way? It is very logical to me. Unfortunately, it's not as logical to some of our partners and there are hurdles along the way. It's a massive education campaign. And you have to get people good at doing this because they're not by their nature. They haven't been trained to do this.

 

Ed Kless  46:56 

Yeah, and let's talk about those hurdles. What were some of the ones that may have surprised you, ones that you didn't anticipate?

 

Andy Armanino  47:04 

Well, some of them yeah, I think that's a very good question because some of them you do anticipate, some of the partners, I probably could have listed out some of our resistance and who they'd be for Ron. And they were. And they continue to be a battle at times. But I think some of the hurdles that maybe we didn't anticipate is those people who really embraced it. The amount of kind of practice that you need, the ability to go out there, have those discussions and then get good at, you can have a great discussion with a client but then coming back and pricing it correctly. I was surprised that the people probably weren't better from the get go. And I also think that this is, I have great stories on this if we had time, but when you leave pricing to the partners hands that are untrained they will underestimate the value that they bring over and over again, even if the client has told them the value that we bring is great. And so I'm pushing the envelope on pricing. I was surprised that partners weren't better at that.

 

Ed Kless  48:21 

That they weren't more aggressive in their prices

 

Andy Armanino  48:24 

Yes, that they didn't perceive. One of the hurdles is they don't perceive themselves the value that they bring to their clients at times, or they perceive it, but not in a big enough way.

 

Ed Kless  48:39 

Yeah, well, I think, and one of the things that Ron and I talked about is, that that's why actors and sports people have agents, because it's extraordinarily difficult to price yourself. And in this, in a way, what you're doing is that in a partner and CPA firm is your pricing the work that others are going to do but it's really about your relationship with that. That customer at the time, and you're pricing yourself and you're just not as good as when you're pricing somebody else's stuff.

 

Andy Armanino  49:07 

I totally agree. And that's why I think Ron talks a lot about, I know both you do, about making sure you have experts, that you have a true skill set in pricing. And we've developed that now at Armanino, you know, and I think it's incredible. I know a couple of Ron's disciples here, and I read some of the information they put out and, you know, I'm like, wow, it's good. So you need those people, but it doesn't happen in mass, and what you have to recognize is it's, again, very logical. We have partners that have all kinds of different personality types. Some people are very comfortable in those discussions. Some people will value themselves and can value themselves, and others are just far less comfortable. And I don't think Armanino, and Ron I'd be curious to get your voice on this, I don't think at times we've made the decision to say you know what people just should not be involved in this process at all, period.

 

Ron Baker  50:04 

I wish we would. But that's very difficult to do in a partnership model.

 

Andy Armanino  50:09 

It is. It is.

 

Ed Kless  50:11 

Yeah. It doesn't make them bad people, right? It's just that that's just not a competency and just like you wouldn't put somebody who's a tax expert on an audit, do you just not give them the pricing authority?

 

Andy Armanino  50:25 

Well, and I think this goes back to this whole thing about having a fixed mindset, is a I've always done it a certain way. I'm successful enough. I have a relationship. That's enough with my clients. There are partners here that over the years I looked in their eyes and said, You know what, if you make a mistake on this client, we're fired. If another partner down the hall makes a mistake on their client, they get a get out of jail free because they have a relationship that is an open, deep relationship with our client. And needless to say that carries over into pricing.

 

Ed Kless  51:01 

And turning to what do you think went a little bit better than expected?

 

Andy Armanino  51:06 

Well, I told Ron that the tax group would be impossible. And at first there, and I think it continues, you know, you always have to get over some resistance. But I think we had a partner in particular, Jerry Clancy, who initially kind of threw up his hands and said, I don't buy in. He went and met with Ron for a couple hours, and they spent some time really digging into it. And Jerry came back and said, I'm in, I will be one of the champions in the tax practice, in some of the kind of more compliance related things on the tax practice, I thought would be really difficult. But we've had better buying than I would have would have expected there.

 

Ed Kless  51:50 

That was actually the voodoo doll that Ron built to that guy. So I want to ask you, we got about a minute or two minutes left. What advice do you have for young people entering the profession?

 

Andy Armanino  52:09 

I mean, again, I love speaking to young people, what I try to do is give them an inspiring message about what's possible in this profession. Don't come in and think that, and Ron might have been at the partner rally where I pounded the tables one time when people said, I'm a tax person, or I'm an auditor, and I slammed the table and said, You're more than that. You are a client advisor, you are a counselor, you are someone that your client depends on, you can make a difference. And so that's the message I try to bring to young people today is you can do a ton in this profession, clients need help. The world is crazy out there for them. And they need people who will sit with them, listen to them, and then try to drive value. And it's exciting. It's amazing today, what's possible.

 

Ed Kless  53:01 

Yeah, and I think that goes back to what you were looking for in your hires, as well as the people who can effectively communicate. And it's funny, the more we get technology, the more that the ability to communicate effectively one-to-one becomes more important, because the touches are just less frequent sometimes because of the technology.

 

Andy Armanino  53:20 

I think marrying technology with the human touch is success in the future. And I totally agree with what you just said, it's going to be more important than ever, that we touch humans. That's something that machine can't do, we can emotionally affect our clients. And it's important to do so.

 

Ed Kless  53:40 

Yeah. So even though Watson is diagnosing disease, you don't want to hear it from Watson that you have cancer.

 

Andy Armanino  53:46 

Yeah, absolutely.

 

Ed Kless  53:50 

Well, this has just been absolutely fantastic. And we really appreciate you coming on and spending some time with us today and sharing your wisdom and knowledge to our audience. And as Ron said earlier, we do hope you come back.

 

Andy Armanino  54:04 

I appreciate it, guys. It was fun and I'd be happy to come back. Keep doing what you're doing.

 

Ed Kless  54:08 

Alright. Well, Ron, what do we got coming up next week?

 

Ron Baker  54:14 

Free-Rider Friday, Ed, for October. I can't believe it's the end of the month,

 

Ed Kless  54:16 

Unbelievable. Well, I'll see you in hundred 67 hours.

 

Ron Baker  54:32 

This is from the Soul of Enterprise: Business in the Knowledge Economy, sponsored by sage, energizing business builders around the world through the imagination of our people and the power of technology. Join us next week folks on Friday at 1pm Pacific time. In the meantime, check out the thesoulofenterprise.com. We'll post our show notes with Andy and we're to learn more about him. And also you can contact Ed and myself at asktsoe@verasage.com. Thanks for listening folks. Have a great weekend.


Andy Armanino started his career with Arthur Young as an auditor and joined Armanino LLP in 1989 where he built a full-service audit offering before becoming, at 29, the youngest partner in the firm’s history. In 2005, he was elected to Managing Partner where he served until his retirement from Armanino in 2018. Andy’s leadership helped propel the firm to be one of the fastest growing and best managed firms in the US, earning awards and accolades from the profession for its entrepreneurial spirit and innovation. Under Andy’s leadership the firm developed new services, expanded technology offerings, grew a full-service consulting department and strategic acquisitions extended capabilities and geographic locations. His most gratifying accomplishment was launching the Armanino Foundation in 2016. Join Ed and Ron for what’s sure to be a dynamic interview.

Named to INSIDE Public Accounting’s 2014 list of “Most Admired Peers” and Accounting Today’s “2013 MP Elite” list for staying entrepreneurial, Andy Armanino is a former Managing Partner of Armanino LLP, one of the largest CPA & consulting firm in the nation. The firm has been named one of the nation’s top 25 “Best of the Best” numerous times. Andy’s past honors also include “Top 100 Most Influential People in Accounting,” “Most Admired CEOs” and “Most Admired Managing Partners” in the nation. Andy was Managing Partner at Armanino from 2005 to 2018 where he focused much of his time on firm strategy, growth and culture. Included in his accomplishments are twice doubling the firm's size, an aggressive growth model of new services, expanded technology offerings and acquisition. Andy will become Chairman of Moore Global on January 1, 2020.