subscription

Episode #400: Tackling Objections to the Subscription Model for Professionals

Recently, two noted consultants wrote up a list of their objections to using the subscription model for professional firms. In this episode, Ron and Ed take these arguments point by point and deliver their refutation of the ideas. Hang on! This one is a rollicking good time. Before we get to the show, let’s take this time to remind everyone that Ron has a new book coming out! If you want to get in early and join the pre-order book club (with special membership benefits including time with Ron) just click here and follow the easy instructions.

Did you miss this show live?

Don’t worry about it! You can always subscribe to the podcast here or listen to the embedded audio on this very page. Either way, you do NOT want to miss this show.

Here is a GREAT CLIP from the show. Check this out and then listen to the full show for even more.

Episode #396: Live from Scaling New Heights - THRIVE

Ron and Ed took the Mainstage at Scaling New Heights where they were joined by Joe Woodard and over 1,000 audience members who will be providing the questions. Conversations include subscription pricing, Marxism, and ESG! No we are not kidding.

This show was LIVE. Really live. Not sort of live. It was on stage with Joe Woodard at Scaling New Heights in front of over 1,000 attendees. Here are some of the great questions from the audience:

  • On the recent show that you did with Dr. Robert Sirico, you made the comment that they're practicing Marxists when they bill by the hour. I want to understand what you meant.

  • If you are a sole practitioner, and you offer advisory, bookkeeping and tax preparation, how do you fit in the subscription billing in that platform?

  • How does a firm leader train their team on better judgment?

  • In a session earlier this week, you said that our firms will be identified by the clients we don't have in the services we don't provide, if that's a good paraphrase. Can you expand on that a little bit?

  • Which KPIs or metrics have you found very useful or practical for tax or accounting practices?

  • You shared with me that you're not a big fan of ESG. And I would love to hear why.

  • So if [subscription] is something we're interested in, what resource, book, podcast, or show will help us model towards that approach? How do I make that transition? What are the steps involved?

  • You mentioned the employee that got the work done in one hour when there was a four hour budget, and then you mentioned 92% effectiveness. Isn't that a judgment? And if it isn't a judgment, why isn't it or isn't that a bad thing?

Joe Woodard also asked SEVERAL questions throughout the show and acted as a gracious host to Ron and Ed.

Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention. 

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #393: Interview with Brian Terrell

Ron and Ed welcomed Sage Intacct Partner Brian Terrell to the show to talk about his transition to offering implementations as a subscription service. The BTerrell Group has offered this option for over a year and we talked with Brian about the results thus far.

Before we get to the show notes, here is a bit more about Brian…

Brian Terrell founded BTerrell Group in 1991 and oversees management and strategy for this Dallas based provider of Sage Intacct financial management software. Sage Intacct is the only accounting application ever to be designated by the AICPA as their Preferred Provider of Financial Applications. In addition, BTerrell’s experienced developers tailor the application’s business functionality to exact customer requirements, when necessary. Born in Plainview, Texas, Brian grew up on a farm where he learned the importance of a strong work ethic and conservative principles. From there, he received his Bachelor of Science degree from Texas A&M University before starting a career with Arthur Andersen & Co. In February 1991, Brian and his wife Nancy began practicing public accounting with Terrell & Terrell, CPAs. Within a year, the firm refocused all professional services exclusively on accounting software and business automation and eventually rebranded as BTerrell Group in 2008. Brian rides 125 miles a week as an avid cyclist and ride leader for the Plano Bicycle Association. He and his wife Nancy live in Dallas and recently celebrated the birth of their third grandchild.

Here are the questions Ron and Ed presented to Brian during the show.

  • How did you go from farming to being a CPA?

  • I have to ask you, Brian, because I was asked this recently and it just kind of stuck in my mind. If you were starting your practice over, what would you do differently?

  • When did you pivot to subscription? And why did you do it? What was the motivation?

  • What's the difference between a subscription and taking an annual price and dividing it by 12?

  • What has been the reaction that you've gotten from some of your fellow Sage partners that you've talked to about doing this?

  • Have you been asked to go back to doing implementations the old way by some prospects?

  • When charing for implementations by subscription, what happens after they're implemented? Aren't customers going to want to lower price?

  • What has been the reaction of the folks inside your organization as you made this transition to subscription? Let me ask it a little bit differently: Did they think you were crazy, too?

  • Talk to us about what you consider a cost of goods sold. Why would you why would you think that that's the right way to go with an implementation as a subscription?

  • What does subscribing to your firm do to the customer from a psychological perspective? I think there's a huge psychological difference between entering into a transaction with a professional or getting a bunch of services, versus subscribing to their firm.

  • Do you also find the subscription business model to be a competitive advantage in that it's very hard to compare your offering to the competition?

  • Have you found better pricing power with the subscription model?

  • Have you found a way to model customer lifetime value?

  • Do you use any specific software to track your financial subscription KPIs?

  • What other KPIs do you look at besides the financial ones?

  • What is the future of ERP software maybe five or even 10 years out? What's your thinking on that?


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention. 

This week was “bonus episode 394 - Umpteenth subscription economy update”. Here are a few links discussed:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #378: Subscription Economy Update - February 2022

From time to time, Ron and Ed like to review the state of the subscription economy especially as it pertains to professional firms, but they weave in some other stories as well. Have you heard that Ed subscribed to a vacuum cleaner and salami? We also talked price increases and what they got right and WRONG about their own subscription. This show was FULL of useful information about the subscription economy and deserves a listen.

Here are a few significant links discussed during the show:


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This week was bonus episode 378 - “AOC's Valentine to Ron” — Here are some of the links discussed:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #376: Fourth Interview with Dr. Paul Thomas

Making his fourth appearance on The Soul of Enterprise is Dr. Paul Thomas of Plum Health DPC. Ron and Ed ask him how he scaled his practice from one to know three offices and what the implications are for his subscription model. In addition, we ask what regulatory barriers to providing care this way should be removed.

Below are the show notes. Use them to follow along while listening to the podcast:
It seems to Dr. Paul that Operation Warpspeed and 3 different vaccination options have helped with Covid. Omicron hit hard over Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Years. Things are starting to fortunately slow.

  • Does mRNA technology mean vaccinations can be developed faster? Dr. Paul believes this remains a political question due to the regulatory bodies and their ability to streamline the approval process.

  • Use the car analogy (Dr. Paul is based in Detroit), mRNA technology is the chassis with an ability to build out capabilities as a delivery mechanism. Think cancer, cystic fibrosis, and many others.

  • Did you know that you can join us at Patreon.com/TSOE for commercial free episodes AND bonus episodes? At a certain level you can get a shout out like Mark Gandy (@g3cfo) of CFOBookshelf.com. Mark recently interviewed Ed - go check it out!

  • How can you scale a Direct Primary Care business? Doesn’t it suffer from the same challenges as other subscription services? It comes down to serving one patient at a time with excellent medical care, forming deep relationships, and delivering on our promise.

  • Dr. Paul WROTE THE BOOK on Direct Primary Care. It’s called Startup DPC. Ron recommends this book because you can learn a lot from Dr. Paul’s experience. Here’s the Amazon link: https://www.amazon.com/Startup-DPC-Direct-Primary-Practice-ebook/dp/B0886GYD9Z

  • During the second segment of the show today, Dr. Paul talked about what he looks for in new hires coming out of residency and how the compensation model works. Admittedly , it’s a bit more detailed than what is manageable in a tweet.

  • How does Dr. Paul reduce churn? It starts with overdelivering on what you promise. Some churn is unavoidable but most patients stay with the practice because they get more value than what they pay in.

  • Dr. Paul mentioned Ikigai. It is a Japanese term that means a reason for being and refers to something that gives a person a sense of purpose, a reason for living. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikigai

  • After a long five years, Dr. Paul modestly increased the price of his services. While increasing business costs were a part of this, he has significantly increased the level of services offered by bringing on new doctors with specialties. Churn was minimal.

  • What can be done to lessen the regulatory issues to make it easier to get access to DPC? The DPC Coalition was formed specifically for this and other DPC access issues that need to be addressed. Find them at @dpccoalition or https://www.dpcare.org/

  • Above and beyond DPC, Dr. Paul recommends that patients hold a catastrophic loss policy as well. However, Dr. Paul firmly believes that low cost, high quality medicine is the guiding light for much of his work.

  • What does Dr. Paul measure as KPIs that you might not find on an income statement? He looks at new enrollments as a lagging indicator. Number of social media posts, number of blog posts, number of speaking events, and excellent Google reviews are all leading indicators.

  • Of the 1,636 DPC practices as of today, is there one near you? Check out the DPC Mapper to find out: https://mapper.dpcfrontier.com/

  • A masterclass in starting a Direct Primary Care practice? Yep! Dr. Paul now offers a DPC Master Class directly from his website, https://www.startupdpc.com/masterclass

  • A big THANK YOU to Dr. Paul for being transparent and sharing what he has learned about starting a Direct Primary Care business based on solid subscription pricing practices. Check him out at https://www.plumhealthdpc.com/ and, if you live in Detroit, consider becoming a patient!

  • Bonus link: Here is an interesting article on how to hire salespeople and ensure they are “accretive” under a subscription pricing model - https://www.saastr.com/a-framework-and-some-ideas-for-your-first-sales-comp-plan/


Episode #364: Interview with Marco Bertini - The End's Game

What is The Ends Game? It’s a play on words, sure. But it’s more importantly the claim that thinking about where you generate revenue from should be less about the means (your costs) and more about the ends (value to the customer).

Before we get to more show notes, here is a brief background on Marco Bertini:
Marco is a professor of marketing at Esade and a visiting professor in the marketing unit at Harvard Business School. He is also a senior advisor to the marketing, sales, and pricing practice at the Boston Consulting Group. He received his doctorate from Harvard Business School, and previously served on the faculty at London Business School.

He is the co-author of the book The Ends Game: How Smart Companies Stop Selling Products and Start Delivering Value (MIT Press), which explores how modern technology stimulates accountability, challenging organizations to succeed from the quality of the outcomes they deliver rather than the offerings they bring to market.

Now let’s get to the show notes:

  • The main thrust behind The Ends Game by Marco Bertini is: How often and HOW do our customers use our solution?

  • An economist would say that you need three things to be successful with your product/service: 1) access is first, 2) consumption is second, 3) performance (upon consumption) is third. Without these three things the customer bears too much risk.

    • Let’s start with access: Financial access (I cannot afford this); Physical access (availability)

    • Then we move to consumption issues (which are easier): Do I have this product in my house and do I actually use it?

    • Lastly, we have performance which is pretty straightforward: Does it do what I want it to do?

  • The classic belief about price is “How much should we charge?” What we seldom ask is more fundamental which is, “What are we charging for?”

  • Is subscription a step in the right direction for (from left to right) access, consumption, and performance? Any time you move in a direction to the right you are getting closer to the customer. And that’s a great thing.

  • Customers should be paying for performance not promises. However, our own customer sometimes have something to do with the outcomes themselves and we have to acknowledge this.

  • If you have read the book, consider this: “The Ends Game is best played in the singular, not the plural.”

  • Why is the car industry seemingly going backwards on the subscription model? It’s all about direct to consumer vs intermediaries. Intermediaries add complications. Car companies do not have direct relationships with drivers. So how should they setup a DTC model without upsetting their dealers?

  • Services as a subscription are a fascination to our guest, Marco Bertini. Primarily because they are more intangible which makes it more difficult to measure an outcome. At the same time, it is a better industry to move to a performance based model and completely differentiate yourself from others.

  • Why does the subscription model not apply to our guest’s employer, Harvard Business School? In his own opinion, there are certain levels of schools. It’s hard for HBS to make a shift when they are doing VERY well. So there is a bit of legacy there. The greatest changes come sometimes when you have to change.

  • Can you have multiple revenue models in the same company? Yes and that completely depends on the outcome — ownership vs consumption.


Episode #358: Subscription Economy Update

subscription economy update

We’ve got a special update for you as a part of our show notes for episode 358 on the subscription economy. For our Patreon members, we always provide a short list of notes that follow along with the episode. We call these “Greg’s notes” — sort of like CliffsNotes but specifically for The Soul of Enterprise. For all readers this week, we are presenting these notes below. They follow the structure and timing of the show so they are great to have at your side while listening.

Here are our CliffsNotes (aka Greg’s notes) for the week on the subscription economy:


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This pas week was bonus episode 358 - Trillions and taxes. Here are a few links discussed:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #352: Reginald Lee on Cost Accounting and The Subscription Model

Reginald Lee.jpeg

Ron and Ed were joined by VeraSage Senior Fellow, and recidivist guest, Dr. Reginald Lee for this show. They engaged in a round-table discussion about value, pricing, cost accounting, project management, and capacity; and how they all change, and don’t change, in the subscription business model. This is an adaptation of a Bonus Episode from July 14th that ran for approximately 80 minutes, available to our Cost-Plus Subscribers on our Patreon channel (https://www.patreon.com/TSOE).

About Dr. Reginald Lee
Reginald Tomas Lee, PhD, is an author, international and TEDx speaker, corporate advisor and trainer in the areas of cash flow profit/ROI and capacity management. He is the author of three books, including Lies, Damned Lies, and Cost Accounting; Strategic Cost Transformation; and Project Profitability. He has written over 40 articles and white papers, and was a feature writer for the Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance. Reginald has advised many major companies, including as Bristol Myers Squibb, Dell, Disney, DuPont, Home Depot, Lockheed-Martin, Toyota, and UnitedHealth Group. Professionally, Reginald has worked for GM, IBM, EY, has been a professor of both engineering and business, and currently teaches operations and supply chain at Miami University’s Farmer School of Business. Reginald has a PhD in mechanical engineering from the University of Dayton.


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #348: Second Interview with Mark Stiving

mark stiving

Each week for our Patreon members, we share notes from the live show. These notes are a quick hit summary of the live show. Easy to scan. Easy to digest and a great way to follow along when listening to the recorded show. They are our version of CliffsNotes (and we know you remember those).

What follows are those summary notes from the interview with Mark Stiving for all to enjoy!

  • Mark’s most recent book — Win, Keep, Grow — is all about pricing your subscription business which we are ALL OVER here at The Soul of Enterprise.

  • Acquisition, retention, and expansion were too close to consulting language for Mark, hence Win. Keep. Grow.

  • If there is a recurring benefit then it makes sense to have a subscription model. That might sound more like common sense today than it did a few years ago but it’s still ultimately important.

  • Customer success is all about making sure your users are getting value from your product. That means they will keep paying and maybe even upgrade.

  • Shout out to Geraldine Carter, a Patreon member and listener. Check out her website at https://www.shethinksbigcoaching.com/

  • Mark addresses the naysayer in his book. The one who says, “Why should I subscribe? I’m going to pay more over time.” The number one reason is that, at least in the world of software, the product keeps getting better and better over time.

  • Are people resetting the value conversation from annual to monthly in the subscription world? Mark see that companies are choosing a time frame based on what they are building towards.

  • You need to have a monthly subscription. It says that you are confident in your product and are going to deliver a ton of value. After a few months, a longer commitment is absolutely reasonable to put on the table. Providing only an annual offer takes away a big benefit of the subscription model.

  • There are three value levers you have when thinking about the subscription business model: market segment, packaging, and your pricing metric

  • A pricing metric is “what do you charge for?” Physical goods, for example. With subscriptions, we get to choose what we are going to charge for and it’s a really important decision.

  • The value metric is how our buyers perceive value from our products. “I love your company because our x went from y to z.”

  • GE went all in on value stories. Check this link out for more: https://www.ge.com/digital/industrial-managed-services-remote-monitoring-for-iiot/article/331691-performance-recovery-on-gas-turbines

  • In SMBs it is tougher to do a dual business model that includes a mix of subscription business. Going from transactional to subscription can be smooth if done correctly.

  • Here’s a great impact statement from Mark: Your new subscription product must be BETTER than your traditional product for your buyers.

  • Did you know that Netflix FIRED customers who were not using the service? Here is a link to more info: https://about.netflix.com/en/news/helping-members-who-havent-been-watching-cancel

  • “In subscription, if you are not calculating your Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) then you can’t run your financials.” —Mark Stiving

  • Hey! Did you know that 15 seconds at this link could change your life? Well, probably not but as a listener, it could help us just a little bit :) RateThisPodcast.com/TSOE

  • Carrots and sticks are how the transition from an older business model to subscription can be handled. In Mark’s experience, it starts with the carrots and then the sticks.

  • We’re doing more for our customers anytime we transition to subscription. We are able to solve more problems for our customers.

  • A big THANK YOU to Mark Stiving for joining us today to talk about his new book. Learn more about Mark at this link: https://impactpricing.com/

  • What’s up for next week? Woke capitalism.


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This week was bonus episode 348 - more with Mark Stiving!

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #347: Project Management and the Subscription Model

347 subscription project management 300px.jpg

What happens when Ed does 70% of the talking? Ron makes it through 100% of the show on project management and the subscription model.

Each week for our Patreon members, we share notes from the live show. These notes are a quick hit summary of the live show. Easy to scan. Easy to digest and a great way to follow along when listening to the recorded show. They are our version of CliffsNotes (and we know you remember those).

What follows are those summary notes for all of our listeners. Enjoy!

  • Change Ed’s view: In the subscription model, project management is rendered completely irrelevant.

  • It’s not PROJECT management anymore because that means it is a temporary engagement. What about relationship management?

  • Part of the key challenge is vocabulary. We do not have good vocabulary yet for project management in a subscription environment.

  • Maybe we should rename the project charter the “relationship charter” given that the phrase project is too temporary and the subscription relationship is not?

  • For project management in a subscription business, you can eliminate the change request for changes to an objective. There is no formal change request process needed.

  • We SHOULD go through the change request process if we change any goals.

  • Shout out to our Patreon subscriber, Mark Gandy! Mark hosts the CFO Bookshelf podcast at CFObookshelf.com

  • We should talk about means vs ends in subscription project management. If the ends change, it might just mean that a customer moves to a different tier in your pricing model.

  • Think about the ends using the landscaper model. What is the customer buying? More here,

  • For project management in a subscription business, the triangle of truth and the scope statement are both dead much to Ed’s dismay (and Ron’s elation).

  • The cadence of conversation becomes paramount for project management in a subscription business. You need to set a minimum level of communication when thinking about a cadence.

  • Have you listened to our show about POSITIVE risks? Check out show number 87 - Risk is not a four letter word

  • What is quality in the context of project management? It is not determined by “good” but conformance to a requirement. Who’s requirement? The customer’s requirement.

  • Agile has its place in a subscription business for managing projects and relationships. Ed talked more about the two most popular - SCRUM and Kanban - at a high level during segment 3 of today’s show.

  • “Subscription puts a premium on capacity.” —Ron Baker

  • “We have to stop confusing being busy with being profitable.” —Ron Baker

  • Check out RateThisPodcast.com/TSOE - 15 seconds could change your life.

  • The subscription business model favors value over volume.

  • Next week, we welcome the author of Win Keep Grow — Mark Stiving


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This week was bonus episode 347 - Alzheimers and Cosby. Here are a few links that helped drive the conversation:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #345 - Interview with Mark Wickersham

mark wickersham

[Editor’s Note: Scroll to the bottom for some excellent resources that Mark provided to us for inclusion in the show notes.]

Ed’s Questions: Segment One

Welcome to The Soul of Enterprise: Business in the Knowledge Economy, sponsored by Sage, transforming the way people think and work so their organizations can thrive. I’m Ed Kless with my friend and co-host, Ron Baker, and folks on today's show, we are pleased to have with us, Mark Wickersham. Hey, Ron?

Ron

Hey, Ed, how’s it going?

Ed

Going great, rehearsing a lot for my show. We'll talk more about that later, maybe in the bonus episode.

Ron

That's cool. Well, I'm excited about today, longtime friend Mark Wickersham is with us, by audience demand, too.

Ed

I know, which is great. So we expect some great ratings from this one, looking forward to it. Well, let me get the particulars out of the way. Mark Wickersham is a chartered accountant, public speaker and number one best-selling author. He is a most sought-after profit improvement expert in the accounting community. He also strongly believes that the old business model, the way accountants are taught to run accounting firms, is not only commercially stupid, but unethical. Mark is a widely published author on practice issues and in May 2011, his book Effective Pricing for Accountants was a number one Amazon bestseller. Welcome to The Soul of Enterprise, Mark Wickersham.

Well, we are happy to have you. For the benefit of our audience who don't know you that well, let's delve into what's the Mark Wickersham story. How’d you up here?

And why do you do this, Mark? Why you do what you do—the Simon Sinek “Why” question?

I love that part of your story. You improved your pricing in the firm that you had started, made it really profitable, but loved doing this so much that you said, “I'm going to walk away from that profit to go over here and start this other thing” because you were so passionate about it.

It's a great story. I have to ask you about this because I did pull that line that I used in your read in from your bio on your website. Why unethical? Why is the current model that most accountants use not only suboptimal, clearly, which you've demonstrated and proved over and over again in all the firm's, but why is it also unethical?

And I would add to that the flip side, which is all of the accounting professionals who put on their timesheets not what actually happened, but what they think should have happened so that when the boss, like you, is reviewing the account, you said, “Oh, look at this, we're right on budget where we thought we were going to be.”

Now, talk to me a little bit about this. In your practice, when you've helped people shift, do you find that some still try to cling on to the timesheet? And what is your advice to them? Or what is your admonition to them, I guess is a better word?

Right and that's clearly the value pricing to which we would certainly want to talk to you about, I just want to harp on the timesheet a little bit. Do you absolutely recommend that people rid themselves of the timesheet, and that’s one of the core messages that you preach?

I think I know the answer to this question, but I want to hear it from you. In your role as a consultant to the profession, how do you handle the question when they say to you, “Well, what's your hourly rate?”

I found it hysterical that people come occasionally to Ron and myself who want help with pricing, and then have they ask the unironic question, at least in their mind, about what our charge rate is.

Well, and so let's talk a little bit about that. We've got about two minutes before our break. Why don't you get that question? What is it that you do from a marketing standpoint that you just don't get that question?

Perfect. Well, we're up against our first break.

 

Ron’s Questions: Segment Two

Welcome back, everybody. We're here with Mark Wickersham, of the Value Pricing Academy. Mark, so funny, you were talking about the timesheet and filling in all the non-billable time. Recently, there was a hurricane, I think it was a couple years ago, and one Big Four actually issued a code to its employees for the hurricane. So if you were put out of work by the hurricane, you had a code for your timesheet, unbelievable. I actually saw the memo that went out, it was hysterical. I have a question for you, Mark. You have said that, per a recent benchmarking report, over 50% of accounting firms don't make an economic profit. You didn't say profit, you said economic profit. Explain why you think that's happened?

I agree. But do you think it goes deeper than that? We do a lot of shows on strategy and positioning and our colleague, Tim Williams, who I think you saw, or met down in Allen, Texas when you came, he's really convinced me, and we say all the time, that you can't value price the wrong customer. And it just seems to me that so many firms try and be all things to all people. They’ve never met a billable hour they didn't like, a dollar they didn’t like, a customer they didn't like, and they just they refuse to niche down. Do you think that's also part of the problem?

I couldn't agree more. I actually think we pay lip service to the relationship. Because our business model is not aligned to monetizing the relationship. It's aligned to monetizing transactions, even to some extent that's true of value pricing, which pains me to say by the way, but I've come to that conclusion. What's your response to that?

I've come to that conclusion because we don't put the relationship is not at the center of the business model. What is at the center is this idea of pricing the customer and figuring out a scope of work and all this stuff, having change orders, if you go out of scope, all this crap. This is why I'm big proponent of subscription because it does away with all of that. I mean, it’s a topic we can talk about later, but I just  think we pay lip service as a profession to the relationship. Because as you say, Mark, there's no way to have a relationship with over 100 clients.

I totally agree. And I've come back to this idea that it's because that sitting down and thinking isn't billable, I can't put that on my pricing proposal, I can't put that on my timesheet. There's no reward structure for investing in the lifetime value of the customer, which the subscription puts at the forefront of your KPIs, your dashboard, and your mind, and innovation is baked into that model. That's why subscription is superior as a business model than just a value pricing firm.

To some extent, Mark, I think making the leap from hourly to subscription is easier than going from value pricing to subscription. So in some respects, those people that are stuck in hourly have an easier time of making that transformation. But that's something that we talk a lot about, we have multiple shows on it. But let me get your ideas on this. You published a book, I think it was in [2016], How to Build a Successful Bookkeeping Business. I think you've had a co-author, is that right? Yes, [Jane Aylwin]. We talk a lot about bookkeepers having deeper relationships with their customers then do the accountants because they're at the coal face, they're usually in there, and they might get called first by the customer when they're having a problem to find out what to do about it. Do you find that's true—that the bookkeepers actually have better relationships with the customers?

I have a feeling we're going to see more move to subscription from bookkeepers then we will form accountants, at least at the start, because they already understand the value of that relationship. And like you said, they have fewer customers as well. That helps because they have deeper relationships with every one of them. I don't know if you saw this, but there was an article recently in Harvard Business Review, of all places, which I just stopped reading because I think everything in it is pretty much wrong. But it was an interesting article called, “What Professional Service Firms Must Do to Thrive.” And they actually had a spectrum, a way to analyze your customer portfolio: commodity work, procedure work, gray hair work, where it requires more experience, and then rocket science, that's the real creative/innovative stuff. And what they pointed out was, firms as they grow, even if they start in their lane, will inevitably spread out across, maybe not the entire spectrum, but most of it, in one way or the other. Even if they start at rocket science, they'll slide down to commodity or the procedure work. And I just think this is a big problem in our profession. We just go after everything. And then we wonder why there's dissension among the leadership and disagreements. We wonder why it's hard to train team members; because we don't stand for anything, we’ll take anybody.

And that's a hard sell, I have found, to try and get businesses, or firms, to niche down and shed lines. I think you're defined by the customers you don't have, and the services you don't provide. Like you said, it makes it easier to say No, when you're easily in your lane, when you know what your lane is.

But it's so counterintuitive, it scares the heck out of people. Well, Mark, this is great. Unfortunately, we're up against our next break.

Ed’s Questions: Segment Three

And we are back with Mark Wickersham, chartered accountant, public speaker and number one bestselling author of the book Effective Pricing for Accountants, we will put a link in the show notes to hopefully drive some new book sales for Mark, maybe get back to number one for you, Mark, how about that? Mark, I wanted to talk with you a little bit about what has been your experience both personally and professionally. Is there anything that surprised you about the way the profession reacted to and it has handled, the COVID-19 situation?

Yeah, interesting you point that out, because I just was doing some rereading for a presentation I had to do this week, and I was reminded of Tim Harford's book, who's also in the UK, and wrote a great book called Fifty Inventions That Shaped the Modern Economy, one of them being double entry bookkeeping, and he makes the point in his book about this, that the very language of accounting is auditory, is language, right? It's a verbal accounting, it's auditors who were the listeners. And we're really getting back originally to the roots over that, over this relationship piece, which I just found fascinating. Any thoughts on that?

Check out Tim Harford, you can find a video of him, I think you would find his stuff pretty robust. And he's got a new one called The Data Detective, which I think you would like as well. You anticipated, in a way, my next question in your answer to the one about COVID-19. And you gave part of your answer, but I want you to expound on it a little bit. Talk about the problems with the partnership model.

Well as my brilliant co-host often says, when these big firms get together, it's dinosaurs mating—I  love that phrase. So, Mark, I'm going to ask you, I think this is probably my most challenging question. So just to give that as a run, we've got about three minutes left. A study was done about 10 years ago of Canadian accounting professionals, so it included accountants and bookkeepers, but people who were practitioners, small firms. Curiously, it came back with the following: that men-owned firms out charged women-owned firms, in roughly the same proportion as we see in the economy, women make 80 cents on the dollar compared to men. So the women-owned firms were charging 80%, roughly, of what the male-owned firms were charging. And what I found interesting about this is they're setting their own price. Do you find anything, in the folks that you work with—and again, this is a phrase that I stole from my mentor, Howard Hanson, this is not sexist, but gender specific. Do you find that there are challenges and differences between men and women in the way they set price?

And I would be curious If you have any data about that, because I think what you just said is absolutely true, because Ron and I have worked with a lot of, especially in Canada, that's where this whole thing started. And we find that the women who move are much more, let's call it, aggressive with their pricing, once it starts to click, I think they're better at it.

Yeah, that's great stuff, Mark. But we were up against our last break.

Ron’s Questions: Fourth Segment

Welcome back, everybody, we're here with Mark Wickersham. And Mark, I know your Value Pricing Academy has customers from around the world. And I would imagine the English-speaking world. So tell me, which countries do you see leading in the diffusion—that diffusion curve, the innovators, the early adapters, and the early majority, you've seen that bell curve diffusion curve? Which country is in the lead in terms of adoption—that is, percentage of firms adopting value pricing?

It's been my experience that the US is still in the lead in terms of diffusion. If you look at some of the AICPA stats, or the state societies, 30% to 40% of firms report they do value pricing. Now, I take those numbers with a huge vat of salt, because it's self-reported, it might not be a random sample, all of those problems. But there is no way if you roll the clock back 20 to 25 years, you would have got five or 10% of firms saying that they do value pricing, or fixed prices, or something like that. I just find it interesting, because I hear different things from different people who say that Britain's ahead, US lags, whatever. And it's just interesting to get different perspectives. The other thing, Mark, I know you like behavioral economics, the whole options, and anchoring, and framing, and choices, and all of that. Has there been any new insights from that field that have caught your eye in terms of how they can apply to pricing?

I haven't. The guy who I keep abreast of just to decipher this for me is Rory Sutherland. And he's from Ogilvy & Mather in the UK. He's all over on video, you can catch him speaking at conferences through YouTube or whatever. And he always comes up with some really interesting way to frame a pricing issue, because that's part of his work is in pricing. How about for firms that want to transition to value pricing, obviously, they should join your Value Pricing Academy. But I know you've published a lot of books, which of your books would you point them to? To get their feet wet? To be exposed to the idea?

Mark Wickersham 

That's a good question. I think that my second book, which is A Practical Approach to Value Pricing, is arguably the better one, because my first book I had no idea what I was doing. I had never written a book before, and so whilst people say wonderful things about it, it was a kind of a scattered getting my thoughts out, whereas the second one was much more structured in terms of some of the key foundations of value pricing. So that's the one I'd always recommend—start with A Practical Approach to Value Pricing.

Ron

Okay, excellent. And we'll link to all your books in the show notes. And then I'm also curious, have you got anything new in the works?

Mark, I just have to say this. I remember you sent me a video of one of your programs. And I was just amazed as you were going through something that had like 25 ideas for firms. One of them was to start a social club, a CEO/CFO club, I forget what you called it, CEO roundtable or something. And you went through all of these things. And I just thought, this guy is not just doing value pricing. Since value pricing touches everything else in the firm, your scope is far beyond value pricing. I get the branding, and I get why you want to say that, I'm just saying that I know that your content is way beyond pricing.

Awesome. And Mark, where can people find you? What's the best way to learn more about what you do?

Mark

All sorts of ways. So connect on LinkedIn, anyone who connects on LinkedIn, I can then send through some links to some free resources. I have a Facebook group called Value Pricing with Mark Wickersham. I actually spend more time on Facebook than LinkedIn. So I interact with people via that, and I run I do a lot of live streams on my YouTube channel. So follow my videos on YouTube, come to a live stream session, and type some stuff in the comments. And then we can start a conversation.

Ron

Excellent. Well, Mark, thank you so much. It's been an honor to finally have you on, it's long overdue but thrilled that you gave us some time here. Thank you so much. Ed, What do we have coming up next week?

Ed

Next week, Ron, I'm excited that we're going to welcome to the show Mustafa Akyol, author of Reopening Muslim Minds: A Return to Reason, Freedom, and Tolerance, and Islam Without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty. It’ll be fun.

Ron

Looking forward to it, see you in 167 hours.

Ed

This has been The Soul of Enterprise: Business in the Knowledge Economy, sponsored by Sage, transforming the way people think and work so their organizations can thrive. I'm Ed Kless, with my friend and co-host, Ron Baker, and we are signing off, but please do us a favor and subscribe to the podcast on your player of choice. And we'll see you next week.

 

More Resources from Mark Wickersham

FREE BENCHMARKING SURVEY RESULTS

In July 2019 I carried out a survey of 2,683 accounting professionals to find out exactly how – and how much – they charge for bookkeeping services.  You can grab a free sample copy here:

https://www.wickersham.co.uk/store/eGMMmYv4 

FREE LIVE TRAINING WITH ME EVERY MONTH

Is this the year you want to take your income to another level?  Join me every month on a 60-minute online training session and I’ll share with you powerful pricing strategies.  Click here to find out more and to get on the VIP list…

https://www.wickersham.co.uk/p/free-mentoring 

FREE SUPPORT GROUP

Have you visited my Facebook group?  It’s dedicated to helping accounting professionals master value pricing.  To request access to it, click here  https://www.facebook.com/groups/valuepricingwithmarkwickersham/

BECOME A FOUNDER MEMBER

Last month I launched the Online Live Academy and this is your opportunity to be a founder member with a special price locked in for life.  Find out more here, https://ola.wickersham.co.uk 


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This week was bonus episode 345 - Sous Vide and Aduhelm. Here are a few links that helped drive the conversation:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #343: Price Sensitivity Factors in the Subscription Business Model

343 price sensitivity 300px.jpg

This episode was a reboot of Episode #61. See that show’s notes for more detail on the 10 price sensitivity factors. In this episode, we discussed these 10 factors in the context of the subscription business mode.

The following is excerpted from Chapter 14 of Ron’s book, Pricing on Purpose: Creating and Capturing Value.

Price Elasticity vs. Price Sensitivity
Certainly mathematics has its place in pricing, allowing us to test, predict, and determine elasticity. Yet, since pricing is an art more than a science, judgments are also vitally important and cannot be substituted with mathematical precision.

Even if a company possesses a precise elasticity calculation it knows is accurate, it would only be part of the puzzle of pricing. Since elasticity normally lumps “consumers” together, it does not help us in segmenting customers into different value propositions, thereby offering individuals different bundles in order to maximize profit.

Ten Factors of Price Sensitivity
Thomas Nagle identifies ten factors affecting price sensitivity in their book, The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing.

  1. Perceived Substitutes Effect

    This effect states that buyers are more price sensitive the higher the product’s price relative to its perceived substitutes.

  2. Unique Value Effect

    Buyers are less price sensitive the more they value the unique attributes of the offering from competing products. This is precisely why marketers expend so much energy and creativity trying to differentiate their offering from that of their competitors.

  3. Switching Cost Effect

    Buyers will be less price sensitive the higher the costs (monetary and nonmonetary) of switching vendors.

  4. Difficult Comparison Effect

    Customers are less price sensitive with a known or reputable supplier when they have difficulty in comparing alternatives.

  5. Price Quality Effect

    Buyers are less sensitive to a product’s price to the extent a higher price signals better quality. These products can include image products, exclusive products, and products without any other cues as to their relative quality.

  6. Expenditure Effect
    Buyers are more price sensitive when the expenditure is larger, either in dollar terms or as a percentage of household income. Business purchasers look at the total amount of the purchase, while households will compare the expenditure to total income.

  7. End-benefit Effect

    This effect is especially important when selling to other businesses. What is the end-benefit they are seeking? Is it cost minimization, maximum output, quality improvement? The fulfillment of the end-benefit is often gauged by its share of the total cost.

    The end-benefit effect is also psychological. Think of going out for a romantic anniversary dinner and paying with a two-for-one coupon. Think of the Michelin tire ads showing a picture of a baby in diapers next to its radial tire proclaiming, “Michelin. Because so much is riding on your tires.”

  8. Shared-cost Effect

    When you spend someone else’s money on yourself, you are not prone to be price conscious. This is one reason airlines, hotels, and rental car companies can all price discriminate against business travelers, because most of them are not paying their own way.

  9. Fairness Effect

    Notions of fairness can certainly affect customers, even when they are not economically (or mathematically) rational. We accept discounts more naturally than premiums.

  10. Inventory Effect

    The ability of buyers to carry an inventory also affects their price sensitivity. The perishability of the item in question is another factor to consider.


In the subscription model, these ten factors reside in your strategy, positioning, branding, marketing, and value proposition. They are spread across the entire portfolio of customers.

Search, Experience, and Credence Attributes
From a marketing perspective, products and services can be separated into three useful classes: search products, experience products, and credence products.

Search products or services have attributes customers can readily evaluate before they purchase. A hotel room price, an airline schedule, television reception, and the quality of a home entertainment system can all be evaluated before a purchase is made. Price sensitivity is high with respect to products with many substitutes, and since most buyers are aware of their alternatives, prices are held within a competitive band.

Experience products or services can be evaluated only after purchase, such as dinner in a new restaurant, a concert or theater performance, a new movie, or a hairstyle. These types of products tend to be more differentiated than search products, and buyers tend to be less price sensitive, especially if it is their first purchase of said product.

Credence products or services have attributes buyers cannot confidently evaluate, even after one or more purchases. Thus, buyers tend to rely on the reputation of the brand name, testimonials from someone they know or respect, service quality, and price. Credence products and services would include healthcare; legal, accounting, advertising, consulting, and IT services; baldness cures; pension, financial, and funeral services; and even pet food (since you have to infer if your pet likes it or not). Credence services are more likely than other types to be customized, making them difficult to compare to other offerings. Because there are fewer substitutes to a customized service, and there is more risk in purchasing these types of services, price sensitivity tends to be relatively low.

Our New Patreon Offerings
Check out our new ways to subscribe to The Soul of Enterprise.


Episode #332: Why Do Consumers Love Subscriptions

332 subscription 300px.jpg

In 2020, Zuora and Subscribed Institute commissioned The Harris Poll international survey on what consumers most value about subscriptions: The latest “The End of Ownership” report.

And some fascinating findings from the latest Subscription Economy Index™.

We’ll also answer a listener’s question on pricing and offering options, and how they are different under Value Pricing 1.0 and 2.0.

Why do consumers love subscriptions?:

  • Convenience (42%)

  • Variety (35%)

  • Cost Savings (35%)

The benefits aren’t just seen as transactional or incidental. They actually have a cumulative, qualitative effect on building a relationship between brands and consumers.

Other adjectives: Transparency, efficiency, flexible (upgrade, downgrade, pause, etc., as needs change). No more ownership lock-in (depreciation, repairs, recycling, etc.), more variety. Always up-to-date

Jennifer Hyman, co-founder and CEO of Rent the Runway: “The world of fashion rests upon a myth. It does not work unless it convinces you, as the consumer, to buy more and more things that you don’t need. I’m saying the pride of ownership is dead, and the pride of access is the new luxury.” Ed: Is this true in IT? Apple?

There is no other business model that guarantees regular check-ins and active customer participation better than subscription.

Subscription Economy Index™ (SEI)

In 2020: Subscription business grew 11.6%, while product-based companies declined by 1.6%.

In FY2020 Q4: subscription businesses experienced 21% growth versus 3% for S&P 500 companies (a factor of 7 higher growth).

From TSOE Listener Lee Handley

“Have you seen ‘The Last Blockbuster’ “documentary on Netflix?] What a perfect topic to tie into a “Flawed Business Model” discussion. It helped me articulate an insight from your book. If the model is wrong, the business will fail—it’s only a matter of time.”

The Economy in Mind

In the March 13, 2021 Zuora newsletter, Tien Tzuo interviewed Jonathan Levin,

Dean of Stanford Graduate School of Business.

For the S&P 500, intangibles accounted for 17% of total assets in 1975, and 90% last year. For Microsoft, only 1-2% of its market value is accounted for by tangible assets.

This has major implications for national statistics and business cycle analysis. Historically, investments in assets were a leading indicator, but it’s been falling in recent decades.

Perhaps this is why, even with all the government COVID spending, there’s no inflation?

At the risk of discussing monetary policy, just recall the monetary equation:

            Money Supply x Velocity (the turnover of a $1) = Gross Domestic Product

Take the money supply as a given, though economist Deirdre McCloskey [Episode #293] thinks it needs to be a global measure, not just one country, because of globalization and the interdependence of supply chains, etc. 

What if the economy is bigger than we think. The GDP, as currently measured, was approximately $21.43 trillion in 2019.

We’ve had Mark Skousen on the show [Episode #205], and discussed his GO Index [we also discussed it on Free-Rider Friday #98]. It’s also discussed in Mark’s book, The Structure of Production: New Revised Edition, 2015:

  • On April 25, 2014, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) at the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a new data series as part of the U.S. national income accounts, and the BEA began reporting “Gross Output by Industry”

  • Cato Podcast with Mark Skousen, George Gilder, Steve Forbes

  • Government now recognizes the critical importance of Gross Output (GO).

  • GO measures spending throughout the entire production process, not just final output like Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

  • GO measure total sales volume at all stages of production, includes all business-to-business (B2B) transactions that GDP leaves out

  • In the third quarter of 2014, GO hit $31.3 trillion, almost twice the size of GDP, which was $17.6 trillion. GDP measures the “use” economy, GO measures the “make economy”

  • GDP is comprised of consumer spending, government spending, investment, and net exports, with the first two of these being the biggest contributors

  • GDP overemphasizes consumer and government spending as the driving force behind the economy because it ignores supply-side benefits of saving, business investment, and technological advances.

  • GDP shows Household spending generates more than two-thirds of total economic output, latest U.S. data on GDP, $17.6 trillion, consumer spending $12 trillion (68%), government spending at $3.2 trillion (18%), Private investment $2.9 trillion (16%), (Net exports at -2 percent.)

  • The GO statistic, by contrast, shows consumers less than 40 percent ($31.3 trillion), while spending by business is $16.6 trillion, more than 50 percent of economic activity

  • Consumer spending is largely the effect, not the cause, of prosperity

  • GO is over $23 trillion in 2014. GO is significantly more sensitive to the business cycle than GDP. In 2008–2009, nominal GDP fell only 2 percent, GO fell by 6 percent and B2B spending collapsed by 10 percent

  • BEA’s measure of GO does not include all sales at the wholesale and retail level.

  • Wholesale and retail trade figures are included in GO only as “net” or value added

  • Skousen believes this is a serious omission, comprising more than $7 trillion dollars in business spending in 2014

  • We need to include gross wholesale and retail trade figures. They are legitimate B2B transactions that deserve to be counted

  • Skousen created his own aggregate statistic, Gross Domestic Expenditures (GDE), which includes gross sales at the wholesale and retail level and is therefore significantly larger

  • GDE in 2014 is over $37.5 trillion, 25 percent higher than GO and 120 percent more than GDP.

  • Consumer spending actually represents only about 31 percent of the U.S. economy using the GDE statistic

  • The adoption of Gross Output is the most significant advance in national income accounting since World War II.

  • GO is a reflection of Say’s law (supply creates demand), a supply-side statistic, while GDP is a symbol of Keynes’s law, a demand-side number

  • Gross output [GO] is the natural measure of the production sector, while net output [GDP] is appropriate as a measure of welfare. Both are required in a complete system of accounts

So what if the GDP side of the monetary equation is a lot higher? There would be a lot more room for government spending without inflation.


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This week was bonus episode 332 - Leaving Cal and Silent Cal

Here are some links we discussed:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode #330: In Search of Relationship Value

330 in search of relationship value 300px.jpg

This topic was inspired by Fender, founded in 1946: It discovered that 90% of new guitar players quit within 3-6 months, many within 30 days. Those who stick with it for one year become a customer for life.

So it created the Fender Play app, a digital library of over 3,000 online video lessons on how to play the guitar. It attracted around 130,000 subscribers within 3 years, with a 95% retention rate.

Subscribers spent 40% more on Fender products.

During COVID Fender offered a free trial to Fender Play, and attracted 1 million subscribers within several months. We can learn three lessons, according to Tien Tzuo’s newsletter:

  1. Practicing experimentation makes perfect—It’s OK to admit you don’t know what you don’t know. “You find holes by falling into them. Then you fill them and you never do that again.” Constantly tinker with pricing and packaging.

  2. Stay in tune with the customer: understanding the qualitative human elements of the customer experience

  3. Listen to the analytics: retention is important, but so are harder-to-quantify metrics like engagement. People are messy and complicated

Even Value Pricing 1.0 pays lip service to the customer relationship, relative to the subscription business model. There is no better outward-focused business model than subscription. The relationship is at the center of the business. It also does the following:

  • No silos, smashes bureaucracy (timesheets have no place)

  • Bakes innovation into the model

  • Constantly adding value, surprise and delight

  • The empirical evidence is overwhelming, from Unicorns and John Warrillow’s examples [Episode #327], to the many Direct-to-Consumer brands and B2B subscriptions, and the overall growth in the subscription eclipsing traditional transactional businesses.

  • Higher valuations upon selling the business when it has annual recurring revenue and a track record

Words Matter

We don’t have an adequate vocabulary yet to describe all the aspects of this model. As National Review’s [and previous TSOE guest, Episode 316] Jay Nordlinger wrote:The more experience I have, the more I think that definitions are virtually the whole ballgame. What do you mean? What do you mean by that word or phrase? Once this is sorted out, conversation can proceed.”

We talk about price the customer in VP 1.0 and price the relationship + the portfolio in VP 2.0. But the insurance analogy has been taken too far. 

We are really spreading activities among a portfolio of customers (some use more, some less, etc.). This is why one-off services is such a powerful objection and hurdle to implementing this model. We will figure this out through trial, error, and experimentation.

A “choice architecture” business model

The psychology is different with subscription compared to transactional. You are entering a relationship that requires an action to cancel.

Convenience + Peace of mind + front of the line service are powerful drivers of value, even if not fully utilized.

Simplicity, Frictionless, and Transparency, fosters Trust

There is too much friction in the VP 1.0 model. If the customer needs something different, a Change Request process needs to happen [read: hassle, bureaucracy, and friction for the customer], whereas simplicity, frictionless service and transparency in pricing fosters trust.

All of VeraSage’s work has been around increasing pricing power:

  • It’s why we work with sellers, not buyers

  • Penetration/Neutral/Skim pricing strategies, with our focus on Skim (not that the others are invalid)

  • Branding, strategy and positioning, from our colleague, Tim Williams

  • The Adaptive Capacity Model (Are you busy? Raise prices!)

  • Unlimited Access/Value Guarantee/Perpetual Fixed Price Agreements

  • Niche, Innovation

  • Business advisory services: pricing, KPIs, etc.

  • Customer profit focus/lifetime value vs. transactional profit to the firm only

More Vocabulary

Joseph Pine and James Gilmore refer to buyers as aspirants—they aspire to be someone or something different. Here is where “Transformations” enter the model, and how they explain them in their book, The Experience Economy:

  • “Without a change in attitude, performance, characteristics, or some other fundamental dimension of self, no transformation occurs.

  • “Transformations are individual. No individual can undergo the same transformation twice; the second time it’s attempted, the individual would no longer be the same person. With transformations, the customer is the product!”

And they explain the various aspects of insurance, depending on the nature of the offering:

  • Services Insure: Secure payment in the event of a loss.

  • Experiences Assure: Secure confidence, encouragement, trust, or feeling of satisfaction.

  • Transformations Ensure: Secure event, situation, or outcome.

“Think about the emblems aspirants purchase [or receive] to commemorate the transformations they undergo. Rings, crosses, flags, trophies, pennants, medals, badges, medallions, insignias, diplomas, certificates, and other such emblems all tangibly signify that their bearers have transformed themselves in some way: from single to married, from team to champion, from civilian to soldier, from soldier to hero. Transformations cannot be extracted, made, delivered, or even staged; they can only be guided.”

This economic offering requires three separate phases: diagnosing aspirations, staging transforming experience(s), and following through.

Other Resources

Net Revenue Retention (NRR) rate: https://www.klipfolio.com/metrics/saas/net-revenue-retention-rate 

Harrys sale was blocked by the FTC; They also blocked a women’s razor brand sale. Chilling effect on the DTC model?


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This week was bonus episode 330 - “AOC, Texas, and Cookie Dough”
Here are a few links discussed:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode 327 - Interview with John Warrillow - The Automatic Customer

John Warrillow 300px.jpeg

Ron and Ed welcomed the author of The Automatic Customer, John Warillow. John's work has been a staple of the presentations that Ron and Ed have given on subscription-based pricing since the beginning. His nine models for subscription businesses lay the foundation for almost all subscriptions you will encounter. Join us for what promises to be an enlightening conversation.

Ed’s Questions: Segment One

Well, let me get to the particulars and we'll get John right on because we have been looking forward to this day for quite some time. We've been following John's work for the better part of two years or so, since we've been starting to get into subscription economy. John Warrillow is the founder of the value builder system, a simple software for building the value of a company used by 1000s of businesses worldwide. He is the author of the best-selling book Built to Sell: Creating a Business That Can Thrive Without You, which is recognized by both Fortune and Inc. magazines as one of the best business books of 2011. His next book, which is the one that came to mind to Ron and myself, is The Automatic Customer: Creating a Subscription Business for Any Industry. This was released by Random House in February of 2015 and translated into eight languages. His latest book, which we'll perhaps talk a little bit about, released in 2021, is The Art of Selling Your Business: Winning Strategies and Secret Hacks for Exiting On Top. Welcome to The Soul of Enterprise, John Warrillow.

Well, I'm going to start with subscription. Let's dive full in: subscribers are better than customers. Explain.

And that was pre-COVID numbers. I'm sure it's even higher since then. One of the things that Ron and I had talked about in the professions is getting people to change from using the term client to using customer because of the nature of the word customer, it comes from the word custom, it is their custom to repeat business with you, it is their custom when they came into town to stop by your store. But do you like the term subscriber, or even member, better? For those reasons? Do you think changing that language has an impact?

Yeah, that's how we felt to, especially with the term customer. But I'm starting to like member better, what I think back is to that American Express ad campaign from, I don't know, maybe 20 years ago, membership has its privileges.

What are some of the key mindset shifts that a business owner needs to change when they're going to a subscription model from a product based model, let's say?

I listened to an interview in preparation for the show that you did probably four or five years ago now. And you were critical of Microsoft and how they were rolling this stuff out. Do you think they've improved on what they've done with Office 365? Or are they still struggling a bit in your view?

That was certainly one of our challenges at stage two. We sell business software as well. One of the things, and honestly, I don't know where Ron and I picked up this line from, it may have been your book. And as I was flipping through, I couldn't find the exact line. But our mantra has been that we need to price the portfolio in the subscription model, not price the customer or even the service. Because what you're really looking to do is you're trying to spread the risk pool, it's almost insurance, across the entirety of the pool. And I want to get your comments on that. Did we steal that line from you? Or is that not something you remember writing in the book six years ago?

I love talking about this stuff because people think, “Well, there's always some reason my business can't be subscription,” right? You just gave a great example of selling flowers. But what if I'm retail flower shop, I can't be subscription, can I? And I think, of course you can, maybe you could you could sell some subscriptions. And one of the things I like that you talk about, it's not about becoming a subscription model so much as it is expanding into one. Talk a little bit about that difference? I think it's a subtle but very important point.

I love that. As we would say in America, niche down, but I like niche much better. I think that's a a great phrase to “niche down,” to try to get to where you want to be. Well, this is flying by as I knew it would. We are already up against our first break.

 

Ron’s Questions: Segment Two

Welcome back everybody. We're here with the author of The Automatic Customer: Creating a Subscription Business for Any Industry, John Warrillow. And John wanted to ask you, by the way, I loved your book, I thought your book was excellent. How you laid out the nine subscription models, which was absolutely beautiful. You even gave a little bit of a history of how the European map publishers were the first to really offer subscription, which I found fascinating. But why do you think this subscription Renaissance is happening now? You mentioned the Columbia Record House, which ended up filing bankruptcy—I still think they're charging me by the way—but why do you think that this subscription Golden Age is happening now?

Sure. You wrote that nothing has been as successful in getting people to shop in new product lines. And what I love about this model is it does put a premium on the customer relationship, experience, innovation is baked into the model. You're constantly delighting the customer, you have to constantly exceed their expectations, don't you?

Because you’ve got to develop them into that habit of using you and make it part of their life. I love how you say “communicate like a giddy lover.” But if you do that too much, you can be too needy and annoying. That was a great analogy. I'm going to take your subtitle to heart: creating a subscription business in any industry, because we've been trying to do this, as we said before we went live, in the CPA, legal consulting, and advertising agency space. And I think the model is the concierge or direct primary care medical practice that, I don't know if you're familiar with this—I know you're in Canada—but throughout the United States there's about 14,000 of these general physicians that work in this practice where they have member subscribers paying them anywhere from a cell phone bill a month, or maybe a cable package a month, for access to their doctor: telemedicine, same day appointments, house visits, you name it. And it's just basically saying, look, you're covered for all your health needs, anything that we're capable of doing; if they have to go to a specialist or something that would be separate, their insurance might kick in. But I think that's the model, John, and that model has been around since 1996. A real smart team doctor from the Seattle Sonics founded this company called MD Squared. Do you think this subscription model is possible in the professions?

You mentioned the front-of-the-line model. And in terms of this concierge practice, I want to ask you about this too, because I also think it's tapping into your convenience model and your peace-of-mind model. And I think those are two areas that professional firms completely under invest in. We don't realize how good those make the customer feel. I remember talking to Jonathan Stark, he's got a concierge doctor. He's never used him in 10 years. He said, but I know if I need them, he's there, he'll be right there for me. He says I gladly pay for that. It's kind of like insurance, isn't it?

That's awesome. John, this is just flying by, but it’s great, thank you so much.

 

Ed’s Questions: Segment Three

Our guest today on The Soul of Enterprise is John Warrillow, author of the book The Automatic Customer: Creating a Subscription Business for Any Industry, published in 2015. Ron and I both highly recommend the book and it's been on our hit list for quite some time. John, I want to stay on the theme that Ron has been talking to you about and that is the nine subscription models. When you were developing the book, what was the process for limiting it to nine, to get to the point where you had something discreet about each of these, that made sense in your mind?

And for that [certainty] most of us would pay a little bit of a premium. One of the things I've heard you talk about is, and I love this analogy, the mindset to get into, rather than try to think about a way to give somebody a 10% discount for coming on board a subscription. What can you do to do something so that it's a 10x better than? So talk a little bit about that? I think that is a great way to think about things.

And people probably would use the carwash more, but that's okay. If I paid $30 a month for a carwash I would more likely use it than not, but that's okay.

Off the top of your head, of the nine models that you talk about in the book, have you seen any new ones emerge that made you say, “Ah, there were there was one I missed. I really need to include that if I ever do version two of the book.?”

Another great example of what you called earlier “niching down” that's a great example of that.

Another question that I have for you, you’re probably aware of Tien Tzuo, the CEO of Zuora [Episode #230] and his book Subscribed. His newsletter is fantastic, another one of the other sources that Ron and I go to. He has been begging Apple to get into the subscription business for their products. Right now, I think, about 70% of their revenue is subscription services, a lot of people don't realize that. But he's been begging them to do this for their products. Any idea on your part, why do you think Apple's hesitant to get into the subscription model for its products?

Outstanding. All right, we’re up against our last break.

Ron’s Questions: Fourth Segment

Welcome back, everybody. We're here with John Warrillow. And John, I want to stay on the professional firm and ask you this, talk me off the ledge on this because a lot of people say, “Well, for a law firm or a CPA firm, we have these big projects, or black holes, they're not common. They don't come up all the time. So we couldn't possibly put that on subscription.” Now, I don't buy that. But I know that you profile that Hassle Free Home Services business that will carve out a one-time project, build my deck or remodel my bathroom, and they charge those as one-offs. Is it possible to run a hybrid business model? That is, partly transactional and partly subscription, because that's where I get hung up, because I think these are such different mindsets, that the two don't play well together?

I couldn't agree more. And people are fighting about that with us. I don't know if you've read No Rules Rules by Reed Hastings of Netflix? But it just seems like this model does so many great things. First off, it puts the relationship at the center, but it also blows up silos, and it blows up bureaucracy. Everything revolves around the customer at Netflix. I learned this from the book, they don't have individual KPIs. You can do that in a subscription model. There is no way you can do that in a transactional model.

You've talked about multiples of earnings being the sales price. And I was just wondering, in the professional space, do you have any experience on what most accounting firms sell for, it’s usually one times gross [revenue]? I think if they are subscription they'd go for a higher multiple. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?

They just have to get over that all-you-can-eat fear, like the carwash owners, “Well, what if they come in a million times in a month.” And like you said, and it was a great point, if they did come in that much, it just shows you how much they value your service. It's going to diminish over time, but the value stays there.  Another question I have for you is, and we talked a bit about this during the break, but why do you think companies like Audi and BMW have canceled their automobile subscriptions?

They have that one-on-one relationship, just like Harry's Razor and Dollar Shave Club, that direct-to- consumer is really powerful.

Any new subscription businesses that have come online that have impressed you, or that you've raised an eyebrow, we've got about half minute?

Brunswick is doing a subscription model with boats, and Roam is doing housing around the world, you can live in a house on subscription basis. John, this has been fantastic. Thank you so much. We are big fans of the book. We recommend it all the time. It's all over the place when we talk about this model, really honored to have you on. Ed what's on store for next week?

Ed Kless 

Next week, Ron, we have author, columnist, keynote speaker, and small business expert Gene Marks.


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode 324 - Interview with Anne Janzer

anne janzer.jpg

On Friday Ron and Ed were pleased to welcome to the show, Anne Janzer, the author of Subscription Marketing, and four other books on writing. In addition to being an award-winning author, Anne is an armchair cognitive science geek, nonfiction author coach, marketing practitioner, and blogger. She’s on a mission to help people spread important ideas through writing.

Ron’s Questions: Segment One

Welcome to The Soul of Enterprise: Business in the Knowledge Economy, sponsored by Sage, transforming the way people think and work so that organizations can thrive. I'm Ron Baker, along with my good friend and VeraSage Institute colleague Ed Kless, and on today's show, folks, we are honored to be talking with Anne Janzer, author of Subscription Marketing. Hey, Ed, how's it going?

Ed Kless

It's going great, Ron, I mean, who would have thought that the nation would come together so quickly? On Wednesday, and of course, I'm not talking about the inauguration, I'm talking about over the Bernie memes that we all seem to have united around.

Ron Baker

I just saw him with the guys from the Great White North in Canada, SCTV sketch.

Ed Kless 

No, I think that Bernie has been true to his socialist word, he has been a burden on productivity now, this is just what everybody's been doing the last two days? That's all we've done.

Ron Baker

All right, well, let's bring in Anne Janzer, an award-winning author, armchair cognitive science geek (I love that), nonfiction author, coach, marketing practitioner, and blogger. She's on a mission to help people spread important ideas through writing. She's the author of many books on writing, Get the Word Out, Writing to Be Understood, The Writer’s Process, The Workplace Writer's Process, and of course, Subscription Marketing, which is now in its third edition, which we'll talk to her about. Her books have won numerous awards, and they've been translated into Japanese, Korean, and Russian language editions. So that's great news. Anne, welcome to The Soul of Enterprise.

So before we get into subscription, which is why we brought you on, I want to ask you, what's it like to teach writing to business professionals? Have you been able to remove their jargon?

The Economist has this columnist I just love, Bartleby. And he constantly rails on the terrible language and writing skills of most business people. They write memos that are indecipherable, and just full of jargon. And he just really takes them to task. I just love the guy. Anne, what motivated you to write a book on subscription marketing?

I bet, because revolutions always start from the bottom up, right? They don't start from the big companies down. You know, we've had Tien Tzuo on [Episode #230], the CEO of Zuora and author of Subscribed and he is, I would say, one of the chief evangelists for this business model. He wrote in his book that “In five years, you won't buy anything, but you'll subscribe to everything.” And I actually like how you put it in your book, you say, “In five years, you'll have the option to subscribe to everything and every business will have to accommodate that fact.” But what we see, Anne, is a lot of inertia. Why do I have to accommodate it, it’s not going to affect Me? How do you respond to that?

That's a great point. We have a saying around here that you compete against any organization that has the ability to raise customer expectations. And how many of your customers are comparing your experience with their experience on Amazon, or when they visit Disney World? This model requires such a different mindset. We always talk about how difficult it is to unlearn. Sometimes unlearning is harder than learning something new. Like I think about Fender guitar, I don't know if you've run across them, but their Digital Play, and they are just a phenomenal success story during this COVID pandemic. They're not really selling guitars, they're selling you how to play the guitar and how to play it continuously better. And that's just not the same thing at all, is it?

Right, and rather than just focusing on the transaction, I love what the fender CEO said: If I sell somebody a guitar, and they try to play it, and they get frustrated, and it goes under their bad, and then they give it away, that's another sale that I don't get to make in the future. So just that whole mindset of customer success and in the book, you talk about Inadequacy marketing. And I love this idea: The prospect lacks something that only can be fixed with our product or service. This idea that we're selling solutions, it seems to me you have an issue with this?

And [Apple] has done this since day one. They show the one user using their product, and they are the hero. Yeah, it's such a narrow mindset to think we sell solutions to problem. It's broader than that, its possibilities and opportunities as well.

We talk a lot about value pricing, Ed and I are faculty members of the Professional Pricing Society. We teach value pricing, and [what we call] value pricing 1.0 was all about pricing the customer. Now we talk  about VP 2.0, which is subscription, where you price the relationship. And people say, “Well, that's just semantics. What's the difference between the customer and the relationship?” There's a big difference. Because with Fender, you have a relationship with the customer, it's a direct relationship, they're invested in your success.

You call it Value nurturing. Can you explain that? Because I love that, too.

You’ll get a royalty when we say it.

Right, and you talk about five approaches to this idea of value nurturing, and I love the content and community. Sometimes just leveraging your community of users or members can make a big difference.

I think about Harley Davidson, that's a way of life. It's not just a motorcycle.

Ed’s Questions: Segment Two

Our conversation today is with Anne Janzer, author of Subscription Marketing: Strategies for Nurturing Customers in a World of Churn, and Anne I want to ask you about a couple of quotes in the book that I've picked out. One of them is this, quote, “I've become convinced of the following truth. Organizational boundaries are the enemies of the subscriber experience.” Expound on that

Ron and I are tied into economics as well. Ludwig von Mises is an economist who said that you cannot parse value, right? You can't break down the difference between the value of the experience in a restaurant of the waiter, the food, or the cleanliness. I mean, if one of those things fails, we judge it all the same. So even if the waitstaff is stellar, but a cockroach runs across your meal, it doesn't matter. I want to just take this to the next level, because later on in that same chapter, you say, “In a subscription based business, everyone is in marketing.” period, really, period, which I loved. But when I read that for the first time, I thought, what is also interesting is how some people in marketing are actually resentful of that.

That's such an important point. I think that the challenge is, of course, when I read that phrase the first time through the book, you think, “Oh, everybody in marketing wants that to happen;” but they don't, they really do sometimes want to hold on to the different pieces. And it's really up to them to educate out. I think that's a great, great point. I wanted to talk to you a little bit about Amazon Prime, and what a great success story that is. It offers you the discounts to be able to do the “Subscribe and Save” choice. And I just want to get your thoughts on this. I think Amazon has made it too easy to order and messed themselves out of Subscribe and Save. I subscribed and saved to some things and found myself unsubscribing because it was so easy to just order it when I need it instead. That's the bizarre part, right?

Yeah, and I can't believe it won't be too long before it's not just COVID tests, but also COVID vaccines. In my fantasy world we have Amazon doing the distribution and Chick-fil-A doing the actual injections, I think we'd have a much better experience overall.

Apparently, in fact, our social media person, Greg Tirico and I talked earlier, [Dave Clark, CEO, Worldwide Consumer] wrote a letter today that has appeared about that very thing—offering Amazon up to do a better distribution of the vaccine. So we'll see how that that plays itself out. This next topic I know is a passion of both Ron and I, and that is, you're talking about the common adaptation models of subscription: the trial, the segmented approach, all-in approach pivot as a marketing subscription. And one of the things that you say is the low-risk strategy of dipping your toe in the water is, inherently, a lack of commitment, and it may doom the trial to failure? Can you talk a little bit about that because I think that's a critical point for people to understand who are trying to transition, that you can't be a little bit into subscription.

This goes back to Peter Drucker, this inherent tension between sales and marketing. In so many companies people say, “If marketing would just do their job,” and others say, “If sales would just do their job,” this back and forth. And I think part of it stems from something that was a problem that emerged out of the ‘80s and ‘90s, was marketing's belief that they were there to just provide leads, right? In fact, compensation systems were built totally on just delivering leads, regardless of how crappy they were, it didn't matter. And I think subscription just completely jettisons that idea. So expand on that a little bit, if you would.

It was interesting reading through your book, a concept flew into my mind, which was how poorly some companies that were subscription based performed early on in this subscription marketing world. I'm thinking specifically of cable and cell phone companies. These companies had the model but just then performed completely poorly, and today are still recovering, in my view. So thoughts on that? Why did that happen? Where did they get lost? They had it.

One of my jokes is I'm pretty sure I'm still subscribed to Columbia House Records. I'm pretty sure that somewhere, if I combed through all of my credit card statements, they're getting money from me somewhere.

Ron’s Questions: Third Segment

Welcome back everybody. We're here with Anne Janzer, and her book Subscription Marketing, which we highly recommend. Ed and I both loved it, and if you do run out to Amazon and get it make sure you get the latest edition, which is the third edition. Anne, you were talking with Ed about your adoption models: The trial, the segmented approach, and the all-in pivot. And I just wanted to get your take on the news reports in the last week or so that BMW, Audi, and Mercedes, all have given up on their subscription trials. BMW might bring theirs back, Audi has no plans, and Mercedes, they'll probably bring it back at some point. Why do you think they failed? I have strong opinions about it, but I'd love to hear what you think.

The legacy systems with the dealer networks are definitely an issue. But, and you probably know this as well—I learned this from Tien’s newsletter—Porsche Drive has been expanding, they are in six cities now. And 80% of the people that have signed up for it are new to the brand. They're flourishing with it. In my mind, they're no different from BMW, another fantastic brand. They're the two most profitable car companies in the world. I think BMW just can't get out of the mindset that they're selling cars. And Porsche says, “No, no, you're subscribing to Porsche. You have a direct relationship with us.”

Obviously [Porsche’s] regular customers are getting older, they're dying off. And they're going after a younger demographic, which is probably going to really be helpful in the future. I'm so glad I asked you during the break about direct primary care and concierge medicine, because you said you have a DPC doctor now. And when I look at those practices, and I've done a deep dive on them, and I realized that a house can't stand if it's divided. You can't be a DPC practice and still have fee-for-service and take insurance. You've got to be one or the other. It's kind of like the problems BMW is having [with its subscription trial]. How do you advise, especially smaller firms, like Ed said, you can't be half pregnant with subscription. You're either all in or don't do it?

One of the things that impresses me about the DPC movement is that they're saying that this is why I became a doctor in the first place, to help people. And the typical general practitioner has 3000+ patients, which is why you can spend seven minutes with them when you have an appointment. And now, because they’ve reduced their panel of patients—like you were saying, not all growth is good growth—they might have 600 patients, but now it's not just about treating you when you're sick, it's also keeping you healthy. And they have the capacity to do that. And, to me, that model just makes so much more sense.

It's really fascinating. Most DPC doctors’ patients have less emergency room visits, less hospitalizations, they even take less drugs, which even the pharmaceutical companies are noticing. It's just like you say, it aligns the incentives, which is great. Greg Tirico actually asked this question, and I thought it was a really good one. He said the number one question he gets, and he's never had an answer for is, “What if someone signs up and then leaves in 30 days with all their stuff?”

One of the biggest challenges, and frankly Ed and I've been working on out on this, and still wrestling with it, is when you convert a CPA firm or a law firm that does litigation, or an IT firm that does massive software installations, they have these one-off projects that are really, really expensive, and loaded upfront with a lot of work. Are you okay with carving out separate prices for large projects, and not having those on subscription, but then the ongoing relationship on subscription?

For projects that come up all the time, then my attitude is you can just bake it in. I think we are really hard on ourselves on this because we don't think we're thinking far enough outside the box. We're still thinking we're selling guitars. We're not thinking like we're helping you play better.

When I when I look at, like you say in the book, even marketing powerhouses like Procter and Gamble and Coca Cola are confronted with these direct-to-consumer brands, like Warby Parker, Casper, and Harry's Razors? Didn't Unilever buy [Dollar Shave Club] for $1 billion?

How do you how do you recommend that firms overcome subscription fatigue? This is another pushback we get?

It comes back to that relationship. And the other thing is the innovation, like you said before about [Amazon] Prime, the innovation baked into this model, which I just love about it. You continuously add capacity but it doesn't change your price, necessarily.

Well, and this has been great, Anne, unfortunately we're up against our next break.

Ed’s Questions: Fourth Segment

We are talking subscription marketing with Anne Janzer, the woman who literally wrote the book on that subject. Anne, I wanted to pick up on another sentence that jumped out at me. At first I had a negative reaction to it. But then over time I've come a little bit more accustomed to what it is that you were trying to say, because I read further in the book. You say, “Upselling and cross selling, these are important results of successful value nurturing.” And here's the thing I objected to, “but never mistake selling for creating value.” Why should we never mistake selling for creating value?

My objection was based on my priors, right, which is this notion that, to me, sales is about what we call the value conversation. It is about having that conversation with a prospect. Keep in mind, we sell large systems to accountants, and also people who need accounting solutions, which is, by the way, one of the few areas that is extraordinarily sticky, and switching costs, even in subscription, are astronomical, because nobody wants to change their accounting system. So it's one of the few exceptions to your rule. I think that was my reaction to it. But I think you make a very important distinction there. Because so many people think that, oh, if I just tell them what the features are, they will miraculously say, “Oh, I get it now.” And that's just not the case.

I want to quickly explore something and I have to set this one up. Ron and I do an exercise that we call the Value Gap, and you write eloquently about economic value. And one of the things that we suggest people do is look at their relationship with a current customer and ask themselves, How much value have they actually created for that customer? And then think, How much value can I create for them in the future? That exercise, to me, has really come home with the notion of subscription, because of what Ron was talking about—the continuous need to innovate. So this idea of what can we do for current customers to create value for them tomorrow? Explore that a little bit with me?

The great example from your book that I love is the MailChimp hang 10 when you successfully launch your campaign, which makes me happy when it happens.

And if they took it away, I would miss it. I wanted to get to this, too. I love your conversations about the launch plan. And by the way, folks, you have to buy this book because it is chock full of not only the great theory, which Ron and I love, but the practical little tips that you can do to make this really, really work. So that's one of the reasons why we love this book, there's a great balance. Back to the launch plan, what I'm finding, and I wonder if you're finding this, and you probably are overly critical of this as well, these email campaigns to get you to use. I'm like, “Stop, please.” They're all the same now. People have to innovate around them now, don't they?

Please, please shut up. If you stop I will continue to subscribe. As long as you leave me alone.

It's like the Brazilian steakhouse with the green and red card that you flip over when you want them to bring more meat? The other thing I want to ask you about is what you call the 90/10 rule that applies to new subscribers. If a customer doesn't start using your solution within 90 days, there's only a 10% chance that they'll become a loyal customer. Is that still true? Is that something that continues to bear itself out in your latest work?

Which leads me to a question that we talked about with Robbie Kellman Baxter as well [Episode #319]. And you do mention this a little bit in your book. I'm curious, and Tien Tzuo is absolutely convinced that freemium is dead—long live the free trial. Robbie says he's a provocateur. What are your thoughts on freemium versus free trial? Has there been any clarity from your perspective on that?

That's a great answer, and this has been terrific conversation. The hour flew by. Ron, what do we have coming up next week?

Ron Baker 

Next week, Ed, we have Virginia Postrel, the author of The Fabric of Civilization.

Ed Kless 

I can't wait. That's going to be great. I'll see you in 167 hours.


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

This week is bonus episode 324 - Bernie memes and more. Here are a few links discussed during the bonus episode:

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Episode 319 - Interview with Robbie Kellman Baxter

robbie kellman baxter.jpg

This past week Ron and Ed welcomed Robbie Kellman Baxter, author of The Forever Transaction. We talked about, of course, SUBSCRIPTIONS! Robbie's customers include Netflix, the National Restaurant Association, and The Mail Newspapers in the UK, as well as dozens of Silicon Valley SaaS and consumer subscription companies.

A Bit More About Robbie
Robbie Kellman Baxter is best known as the creator of the popular business concept Membership Economy. She is the founder of Peninsula Strategies LLC, a management consulting firm, as well as the author of the bestselling book, "The Membership Economy: Find Your Superusers, Master the Forever Transaction & Build Recurring Revenue" . She coined the popular business term “Membership Economy", which is now being used by organizations and journalists around the country and beyond. Before starting Peninsula Strategies in 2001, Robbie served as a New York City Urban Fellow, a consultant at Booz Allen & Hamilton, and a Silicon Valley product marketer. She has an AB from Harvard College and an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Ed’s Questions: First Segment

Welcome to The Soul of Enterprise: Business in the Knowledge Economy, sponsored by Sage, transforming the way people think and work so their organizations can thrive. I’m Ed Kless with my friend and co-host, Ron Baker, and folks on today's show, we are thrilled to have with us Robbie Kellman Baxter. Hey, Ron, how's it going?

Ron: Good, Ed. I'm looking forward to this. I've read Robbie's books this year, so I've been marinating in her ideas.

Ed: Locked and loaded for today. I'm sure so let me let me bring her on. First. We'll get the Bio out of the way. Robby Kellman Baxter is a strategy consultant helping companies develop and optimize membership models and subscription pricing, has deep expertise in subscription-based and SAAS models, and the membership economy. She brings over 20 years of strategy, consulting and marketing expertise to Peninsula Strategies, her strategy consulting firm, focused on helping companies leverage the subscription model, the digital economy, and freemium, to build deeper relationships with customers. She is the author of The Membership Economy: Find Your Super Users, Master the Forever Transaction, and Build Recurring Revenue, 2015 [and, The Forever Transaction: How to Build a Subscription Model So Compelling, Your Customers Will Never Want to Leave, March 2020. Robbie coined the term “membership economy” and it is now being used by organizations and journalists around the world. Thanks so much for being with us today Robbie Kellman Baxter.

  • Let's start out with the basics. What's the membership economy?

  • So talk about that difference in your mind. What is the difference between having members versus just having customers?

  • I was reminded when I started hearing the term, there was a commercial, I believe in the 70s and 80s, for American Express, and the tagline was “membership has its privileges.” I'm sure you recall that. And that came to mind. And I think that's a great thing to keep in mind, right? Is, what are the privileges that you're developing? And you call it the difference between having the membership as a product versus membership as the mindset?

  • It is really loaded, but it's a good word. I think it's an important word. One of the things that Ron and I have talked about for years and years and years is that in order to make any change inside your organization, as Werner Earhart says, all transformation, all change is linguistic. So the language you use is very important. And it was funny, because earlier today I was talking to somebody who has a membership organization. And we came to this very same conclusion: you're treating your membership as a product, not as this notion of a relationship. And have you seen, I'm gonna kind of go sideways on this, Ryan Hamilton's appearance on the Stephen Colbert show, where he talks about trying to cancel his cancel his gym membership.

  • He's got a great line in the routine where he says “If you have to write a letter to cancel something in 2020, you're being bullied.”

  • And he said at the end, he says, “I actually had to walk by the gym to go to the CVS to buy the envelopes. But isn't that interesting, the other example that I've heard you use, Ron and I have used it, the Hotel California, the worst membership experience of all of our lives, especially if you grew up in the 70s, was the Columbia House Records, which was literally the Hotel California because I bought the Eagles album.

  • And they wouldn't let me, they kept sending me stuff. And, it's so funny that I think we've had to make this adjustment; they had some really good ideas. But what is it that we can do to adapt some of those great ideas that Columbia House and other places had, but make them with the Cancel button front and center?

  • It's horrible. So, is subscription membership a pricing tactic? Or is it a strategy?

  • So I’m curious, do you use the subscription membership model for all of your pricing? Like in the work that you do, I noticed that you do consulting, you obviously do coaching, which I would imagine is subscription?

  • The industry that I can come from, which is Sage, the organization that I work for. We sell accounting software. And this is one of the big conversations inside the organizations right now who used to sell what we call on-premises software, and then have now moved to Software as a Service. The software is now priced on subscription, but their services are not. And there is similar to your thing, a big-bang upfront, with this kind of ongoing thing. That said, I'm trying to coach my people to get past that and really look to see if there is a way that you can make this subscription and take the loss leader of the big-bang up front? So what are some of your thoughts on that?

  • I think that's very true, especially in the industry that I'm talking about, because nobody changes their accounting system because they think it would be fun, right? Hey, let's do this, that would be fun. We know that they're doing it because they're in a world of hurt someplace, like their current system is significantly deficient in some way. Because really, with accounting systems, and I hate to say this as someone who works for a company that does this, debits equal credits, all systems, ultimately is what those things can do. We are already up to our first break.

Ron’s Questions: Segment Two

  • Welcome back, everybody. We're here with Robbie Kellman Baxter, the author of The Membership Economy and The Forever Transaction. Robbie, on your Membership Economy book, you talk about the move from customer service to customer success. There seems to be a customer success department in a lot of subscription-based businesses. You also talk about how membership is an attitude, whereas subscription is more like a financial arrangement. Because with a membership, you're committed until you cancel, right? I mean, you have to actively break up to cancel. And Ed and I think about this in terms of “choice architecture,” and psychology. There's just something deeply different, whether you call it membership or subscription, about joining something, versus just entering into a transaction.

  • The peace of mind. And the convenience, like you say, I think they're completely undervalued. I'm a recovering CPA, and I work in the accounting, legal, advertising space with professional firms. And I'm trying to get them to move to this. And I realize that you're talking about this in the book, this all you can eat option, but like concierge doctors, or direct primary care doctors, I do think these firms could set up, hey, whatever you need, you're covered. Anything we’re capable of doing under our roof, you are covered. If you get audited, you know just like a doctor, whatever you need, stitches, broken leg, whatever, they'll do it, you're covered, and that just swaddles the customer in this peace of mind and convenience that they will pay dearly for.

  • We talked about, and I know you’ve spoke already at the Professional Pricing Society, Ed and I are faculty members there. So we've been teaching value pricing for years, and value pricing was all about, and you say this in one of the books, pricing the customer—it’s the airline model, your pricing each customer, not the seats. The customer, whether they are business or leisure, when did they buy their ticket, all those types of factors. And in the subscription model, what's different is your pricing the relationship. I think about the Porsche Drive program, I'm not subscribing to a car, I'm subscribing to Porsche. That's a big, big difference isn’t it?

  • And 80% of the Porsche Passport members are new to the brand, which is phenomenal. They did rebrand it, by the way. It's Porsche Drive, not passport. I'm bummed because I thought Passport was great marketing. One objection we get from firms, and I'm sure you hear this all the time, is what about that one-off service? You know, I think you call them Ala carte services? And I'm like, Okay, well, you could carve out and price that separately. But if you're constantly doing that, why can't you just bake it into the model?

  • That's just one of the main disadvantages of value pricing, pricing the customer. And at Professional Pricing Society, for a long time, we thought that that was the trend, you're going to have individual prices for each customer. But the membership economy kind of blows that up and says no, no, make it transparent. Make it Netflix, and just let people use what they need. They're not going to abuse it, maybe 2% might use 20% of your resources, but you can price for that. You can actuarially price the portfolio. That's the other thing I love about this model and spread that risk amongst all of your customers.

  • You said something about the airlines that I just love, you said that they're an excellent example of an electric fence rather than a magnet. I love that. Do you think with the airlines, will we see any major carriers like United move to a subscription option, where you just pay them 50 grand a year and they fly you anywhere you need to go?

  • Do you think they should?

  • We've got less than a minute, Robbie, but just real quick, do you think this is easier to do for a company that's really focused? I mean, I'm thinking the difference between Coke and Pepsi. Pepsi is involved in food, and fast food, and all this stuff. But Coke just does beverages? It's much easier if you're focused, isn't it?

  • It's easier to put guardrails and it's easier to bake in those ala carte one-offs, all of that type of thing. Well, this is great. There's so much more I want to ask you about these books, because I really enjoyed both of them. I think they're both really great, very thought provoking pieces of work. So congratulations, and I know that The Forever Transaction came out this year, right? I think this is cutting edge. This is bleeding edge stuff. And that's, that's how we know it's a great idea. It scares people, right? Anytime you're out there scaring people, you know you've got a great idea.  

Ed’s Questions: Segment Three

  • We are back with Robbie Kellman Baxter, author of The Membership Economy and The Forever Transaction. Robbie, I wanted to ask you about something that you said during an interview with Singularity University. You said, “In order to move to a subscription model, the company needs to have developed a competency in innovation.” And first of all, interesting verb tense. So that needs to have developed a competence in innovation, so is an innovative thinking style a prerequisite to the membership economy?

  • That's hysterical. One of the things I want to ask you about is, I know you've done some work with Netflix, and they are very tied into the fact that they have one choice. It's this, here's your choice, this is what you do. But I know that a lot of folks are saying, and when we teach value pricing, we have always talked about giving at least three choices to the customer. What is your thought with regard to subscription in regard to offering choices? And also, what have you learned about creating what we call fences between those choices, to make them optimized?

  • And what has been helpful with regard to more than one choice, about creating clear differentiation between those choices. One of the things that I see oftentimes is people don't have enough distinction between those choices, and I’m wondering if you had any thoughts or insights on that?

  • You brought up the all you can eat. In the Brazilian steak house, I'm always a fan of that the salad bar and the bread that they give you, which is absolutely delicious, that's just a diversionary tactic to get you not to have the meat. So avoid that. Don't let them distract you. I wanted to ask you about something that Tien Tzuo has written recently about, the author of the book Subscribed. He says that freemium is dead, and long live the free trial. Do you have any thoughts on that? Or, if you have that mindset now? Or are you still, freemium still has its place?

  • That's a great answer, and a great example. I love the way that you give the example of the meat, and all that, that was perfect. So I had a question. You talk a lot in your courses about ethics and trust being an important thing. And I'm going to put you on the spot here a little, I think. What about the ethics of the subscription model for, say, a pharmaceutical company? Should we be able to subscribe to say, Moderna, for early access to future vaccines?

  • Yes, I did. I only have one more minute with you. So I figured I had to go.

  • Sure. And the argument on the other side would be, is that if people are on a subscription, they're helping to fund future vaccine development.

  • I think that from the ethical side, my argument would be, well yeah I get early access, but I helped fund the development of the vaccine. Anyway, great answer. I know that was a sharp left, but I do really appreciate that. Yeah, it's a lot of fun to think about all of these different models.  

Ron’s Questions: Fourth Segment

  • Welcome back, everybody. We're here with Robbie Kellman, Baxter, author of The Forever Transaction. And Robbie, you wrote something in here that I absolutely love and I find very incredibly thought provoking, especially for one of our VeraSage colleagues, Tim Williams, who works in the marketing and advertising space, as a consultant. You say a forever promise is different from a brand promise. How so?

  • It goes all the way back to the relationship, doesn't it, there's just something about putting the relationship at the center of the business. And I know you talk about this as being more than just a pricing model. It is a business model change. I'm kind of a student of business models. And I've learned two things about them. At least two things change when there's a new business model, the pricing strategy changes, you know, we go from buying CDs to buying 99¢ cents a song, and now we're subscribing, right? But the other change that always happens, and I can't find a single solitary exception to this, maybe you know one. But the other thing that changes is your dashboard. Your KPIs are completely different. Airbnb has a different dashboard than hotels, and Uber has different dashboard then taxicab companies. And you say, some companies think of themselves as product companies, we all say we're customer based and relationship based. But our measurements don't reflect it. Our measurements track transactions. So how important is changing those measurements internally?

  • I think a lot of even a lot of accountants don't understand the income statement for subscription business with that rolling forward of the annual recurring revenue, and the calculation of customer lifetime value, and all of those things. This is all new, and GAAP doesn't deal with this very well. And so a lot of companies need some help thinking about the metrics, because we're so used to that transactional mindset.

  • We interviewed Joseph Pine, he's the author of The Experience Economy [Episode #34], and his highest level of value is the transformation. And I just think this fits so beautifully with having a business model that puts the relationship at the center, because when you provide customers with transformations, the customer is the product.

  • What's higher than actually transforming the customer from where they are to where they want to be. You know, we try and keep track of every subscription based business, as I'm sure you do, and you probably do a better job than we do. It's inundating just how many things you can subscribe to, all sorts of things now. Has there been something recently that's really excited you or impressed you? I mean, I see Rome, where you can subscribe to houses, you can subscribe to a boat now from Brunswick with sailing lessons from a captain, and all this kind of stuff. Is there anything out there that you see that's really novel and new?

  • You have also started thinking about the Internet of Things. That's going to be just an effervescence of all this, isn't it?

  • The other thing you point out, and I love this, that many companies prioritize acquisition over retention. But that's a misplaced mindset. And we see this all the time, your cable company gives somebody six months free, and you've been a member for 15 years, and they give you nothing. How do you coach your people through that?

  • Awesome. Well, Robbie, this is great. Any new books in the works?

  • That's going to be in my feed. So I look forward to that.

  • Thank you so much, Robbie. This has been fantastic. We knew it would be, and congratulations on the books. They're really, really good, and we recommend them highly. So, Ed, what do we have coming up next week.

Ed Kless: Next week, Ron, we have Peter Robinson, host of Uncommon Knowledge.

Ron Baker: My hero, and the author of Ronald Reagan's “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall” speech. I’m really looking forward to that. See you in 167 hours.


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

This week was Bonus episode 319 - “The C-19 vaccine and the FDA”. Here are some of the links we discussed:

Episode #317: Subscription Economy Update

317 10.42.20 AM.png

After the plethora of interviews these past few months, Ron and Ed return to their examination of the subscription economy. They looked at new subscription offerings they have collected including some in professional firms as well as the overall state of subscriptions in the face of C-19.

Subscription Economy Update

  • Ron’s sees his recent webinar audience moving beyond the “how to” questions about the subscription economy. These ideas are resonating.

  • Ed ran a CPE webinar called “Sell your brain, not your time” and the questions were more about the implementation of subscription pricing as opposed to a defensive posturing.

  • People are starting to go beyond the three choices for subscription. It starts to get confusing around 5 and you’ve lost them at 6 or 7. There is a propensity towards moving towards 3 subscription prices but with a toggle like annual vs monthly.

  • You can’t have a $50,000 a year customer and a $500 a year customer at the same time. This is obvious with subscription pricing but, honestly, you shouldn’t do it anyway!

  • A lot of the questions implicitly imply that their firms don’t have anything of value in which to compete. But how do they compete now? If you have customers now, you obviously have a value proposition. You just need to tease out the value proposition.

  • Jody Grunden, Summit CPA, removed growth constraints with a subscription model. He grew the firm from $600,000 in revenue in 2004 to $7,000,000 today! https://www.thesoulofenterprise.com/tsoe/subscription-pricing-summit-cpa

  • Can you have value pricing 1.0 (pricing the customer) and value pricing 2.0 (pricing the relationship) in the same firm? Ron’s long term answer is no. So is Ed’s. Maybe you can have one-offs, but the ultimate goal is to have a relationship with the customer, not a transactional relationship.

  • Areas of specialization in larger firms provide an opportunity for various subscription offerings. The Apple One service is a great model for professional firms to leverage.

  • Recidivist guest Rabbi Daniel Lapin has a subscription pricing option now at WeHappyWarriors.com

  • Tien Tzuo has been talking about freemium vs free trial in his newsletter: When it comes to freemium vs trial there is a clear winner. It’s a free trial. Freemium users have not bought into the value of your services.

  • Something that feels obvious but needs to be said: Psychology and behavioral economics play a big role in subscription pricing. 

  • A question to ponder: Would you subscribe to a pharmaceutical company? Yes, and we may start to see experiments in this area.

  • Americans tend to underestimate their subscription spend by 1/3rd according to a new study by The Atlantic

  • Tien Tzuo has also been writing about how “every day is prime day”. Here is the full post: https://medium.com/@tientzuo/every-day-is-prime-day-2322a6867d0

  • Unbundling of the automobile: https://medium.com/@tientzuo/the-unbundling-of-the-automobile-8a43bad390d3


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

This week was Bonus episode 317 - “Non-POTUS election results”. Here are some of the links we discussed:

Episode #311: Second interview with Michael Munger

michael c munger

Michael Munger was an absolute hoot! If Ron had him as a professor in college he might have become an economist!

Before we get to the show notes, a bit more about Michael:
Professor Michael Munger received his Ph.D. in Economics at Washington University in St. Louis in 1984. Following his graduate training, he worked as a staff economist at the Federal Trade Commission. His first teaching job was in the Economics Department at Dartmouth College, followed by appointments in the Political Science Department at the University of Texas at Austin 19861990 and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 19901997. At UNC he directed the MPA Program, which trains public service professionals, especially city and county management. He moved to Duke in 1997, and was Chair of the Political Science Department from 2000 through 2010. He has won three University-wide teaching awards the Howard Johnson Award, an NAACP Image Award for teaching about race, and admission to the Bass Society of Teaching Fellows. He is currently director of the interdisciplinary PPE Program at Duke University.

Ron’s Questions: First Segment

  • Well, Mike, we had you on the last time in May of 2018 (May 2018, Episode #190). So just real quick, how have you been holding up with COVID? How's it affected your work at Duke? 

  • That's great. Well, you know, last time we had you on we talked about your book to Tomorrow 3.0, which had just come out that year in 2018. This time, I'm dying to talk to you about your 2019 book, Is Capitalism Sustainable? Is it true, that’s a collection of different essays you wrote between 2005 and 2019?

  • So before we give the spoiler alert, and you give the answer to the question—is capitalism sustainable?—why did you feel the need to put that book together last year?

  • Right. No, you talk a lot about that. And I want to get there with you. You also gave the definition of sustainability, I think, from the Environmental Protection Agency's website: “the meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Using that definition, Mike, is capitalism sustainable?

  • You call it the road to cronyism. And do you see any path off that road if we stick with democracy?

  • No, that was brilliant. You anticipated my next question, because you said the most important concept in political economy is permissionless innovation. I thought that was a pretty profound statement because we've had Adam Thierer on (Episode #294, June 2020) and he wrote that book, Permissionless Innovation, and he also wrote another one called Evasive Entrepreneurs, how the Ubers of the world go around the regulation. So you're somewhat optimistic as long as we have that constant dynamism, that constant creative destruction, and entrepreneurs, that we can overcome the road to cronyism?

Ed’s Questions: Segment Two

  • We're talking with Duke University's Professor Michael Munger about his book Is Capitalism Sustainable? and other topics. I thought I would be remiss Michael if I didn't ask you about something that has come up in the news lately. I think September 13th was the 50th anniversary of what's known as the Friedman Doctrine and his article The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. And the New York Times had a huge symposium about it. But I wanted to get your thoughts on this, because this is something that 50 years on, we're still talking a lot about. The fact that corporations need to do more than just produce profits, they need to sustain something else, they need to create value for society some other place. What are your thoughts on the Friedman Doctrine?

  • I'm glad I got you riled up on a Friday. Well, if that gets you going, you're going to love my next question, which was an article that came across my desk from, of all places, Teen Vogue, which is now banned in my house by the way. So here's the quote, ready? “Capitalism is defined as the economic system in which a country's trade and industry and profits are controlled by private companies”… Here's the kicker…“instead of by the people whose time and labor powers those companies.”

  • Yeah. And one more we got about two minutes before the end of this segment, but this is one that I came across from an article in a Canadian magazine called Canadian Dimension. The author is Richard Wolff. And he says in “COVID-19 and the failures of Capital”: The result is that neither private capitalism nor the US government performed its basic duty of an economic system, to protect and maintain public health and safety. US capitalism response to the coronavirus pandemic continues to be what it has been since December of 2019, too little too late. It failed. It is the problem. And I look at the world, because you kept Kiwi fruits in all of the stores throughout the entire pandemic, and you but you couldn't buy napkins or toilet paper and you were upset that it's a failure of capitalism. This is absurd.

  • Yes.. And we've been referring to it, I think this was Bob Murphy who referred to it as “The Great Suppression” [it was Gene Epstein who first said that, not Bob Murphy]. I love that.

Ron’s Questions: Third Segment

  • Well welcome back, everybody. We're here with Duke University Professor Michael Munger. And Mike, in your book, you talk about Dan Ariely the author of Predictably Irrational, we've also had him on (Episode #43). But you make a really good point about the behavioral economists in general, that they take a large number of dim bulbs, and they say but once they get together in a mob they can suddenly solve all these problems, and you're talking about by voting. And then they stop there, and they talk about the weaknesses of the market and people's irrationality, but they never apply it to government.

  • That brings to mind the [William F.] Buckley quote, “I’d rather be governed by the first 500 names in the Boston phone book rather than the faculty at Harvard.

  • That's true. You know, another thing you do really well in the book are your chapters on price gouging, and anti-price gouging laws, they’re just brilliant. You lay out the three problems. But give me the best case you can for why these laws are so irrational?

  • Then you make another point that I think is really profound is the guy that comes off of his couch watching the football game in Ohio and brings generators and needed supplies to a disaster area, he gets arrested versus the guy who does nothing.

  • And you also compare it to laying siege to a city. Yeah, that would be an act of war if an army did it. But we call it public policy

  • It’s amazing. You know, Mike, I'm out here in California where we're being just inundated with wildfires. And, of course, it's all blamed on climate change. But the whole carbon emissions “market failure,” we need a carbon tax. I'm sure you've heard this. But you've taught me, and other economists have taught me that prices are not an input to the process, the result of a discovery process. How confident are you that government knows what the right price is to put on the carbon tax?

  • Great, great point. The other part of your book that I really enjoyed was you take on recycling pretty strongly, and you have this acid test for determining whether something is a resource, or garbage. Can you explain that?

  • And as you point out, whether the government separates our trash or we do it, it's a waste of labor.

  • This has been great. I've really enjoyed it. Thank you so much Mike for coming back on. Ed's going to take you home in the last segment. But thank you so much. It's always a great pleasure.

Ed’s Questions: Fourth Segment

  • We're back with Professor Michael Munger of Duke University. During the break, folks, Michael and I found out that we're both running for our respective Texas and North Carolina House. So let's talk a little bit of politics. We talk a lot about business and government but what about this thing called the duopoly? This thing led by that Commission on Presidential Debates, which sounds so official, that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democratic and Republican Party. How do we take down the duopoly?

  • And one of the things I want to ask you about. There's a fairly controversial issue in the Libertarian Party. What do you think about going to rank choice voting is a potential workaround around that first past the post and would encourage more parties; like what they're doing in California, which is the open primary system, and you just have the top two, which of those in your mind the better of the two?

  • Yeah, my favorite this week has been all the people I've had to educate on “A vote for Jo Jorgensen is a vote for”…and fill in the candidate they oppose. By what logic do you get there at all? It really burns me, it is just so condescending to say that my vote on principle is really a vote for something that I detest.

  • Or if you really thought that your vote needed to mean something you would move to Wisconsin, because where you live in California or New York is not going to matter. Well, before we started, I made this joke about the Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dying two weeks ago when it seems like it was 10 years with this new cycle. And I know that something that Russ Roberts has talked a lot about is this political discourse is just getting more and more sour and the tribalism. How do you see us emerging out of this at some point, or is this may be going to get worse? Have we reached the bottom of the barrel in your view?

  • All right, well, you got a lot in there. Michael, thank you so much for joining us on The Soul of Enterprise. This has absolutely been a blast. And hopefully we will, one day when all of this starts to lift, my brother as I mentioned to you last time also works at Duke. So I would love to come out and have a beer. Maybe I can sit in between you and Dan Ariely, that would be great. Thanks for being on The Soul of Enterprise.

A Few Extra Links For You…

We had such a wide ranging conversation with Micahel Munger and we didn’t want you to miss these links. They are not endorsements (as you will see from the Teen Vogue link) but they were points of discussion during the show.

  • A Friedman doctrine‐- The Social Responsibility Of Business Is to Increase Its Profits

    “There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception fraud."

  • What 'Capitalism' Is and How It Affects People

    Capitalism is defined as an economic system in which a country’s trade, industry, and profits are controlled by private companies, instead of by the people whose time and labor powers those companies. 

  • COVID-19 and the failures of capitalism

    The result is that neither private capitalism nor the US government performed the most basic duty of any economic system: to protect and maintain public health and safety. US capitalism’s response to the coronavirus pandemic continues to be what it has been since December 2019: too little, too late. It failed. It is the problem.


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

New this week!

Bonus episode 311 - DJT C-19 and more. Here are a few links we discussed:

Episode #303: Value Pricing 1.0 vs. Value Pricing 2.0

Ed and Ron discussed an email Ron received from listener Byron Johnson, a CPA in Canada. This episode explores the many differences in the business model of Value Pricing vs. the subscription business model. They are entirely different, and time will tell how well the professions adopt this new model.

Hi Ron,

You were kind enough to share some resources with me 2-3 years ago after I left a firm and started my own firm. I’ve read your Implementing Value Pricing book and I’m a regular listener to TSOE (yes, the Greg Kyte version). I am a fan. Thank you for all of that.

I’ve been wrestling with a thought and wanted to reach out to see if you might have a brief comment. I’ve heard you refer to subscription pricing as VP 2.0 on several occasions. I’ve also heard you indicate a shift (at least I think it’s a shift) from pricing the customer to pricing the portfolio. I’m just really trying to figure out and implement this whole pricing thing better.

It just struck me recently that I don’t think I would like to be value-priced in the true sense of the term. An anecdote to illustrate: My wife and I are currently considering some significant renovations on our home, and we’ve solicited a couple of quotes to do so. Now, I have no objection to receiving quotes that vary. We may have more confidence in a contractor with a higher quote than one with a lower quote. It then becomes our task to evaluate at what point the higher quote becomes too expensive relative to the value received. No harm, no foul with differences there.

But if I knew that the contractor I like (the higher priced one), increased the price of my quote over the quote he gave my neighbor for doing exactly the same job (hypothetically) just because he perceived I valued it more or I had more resources, or whatever, I think I would be royally ticked. Shouldn’t the price he is willing to do the exact same thing for two parties be exactly the same, and then it becomes the duty of those parties to determine if they value it or not and subsequently pay that price or not? 

It just strikes me that the more we deliver a similar service, the more that price should be consistent across customers. Maybe that is what you are getting at when you talk about pricing the portfolio on a subscription basis? Maybe there should be a little more consistency knowing that you are going to win on some and loose on others, but that overall the portfolio is good.

It is almost like with subscription pricing there is a general pricing grid that, yes, has options, but it is more or less the same options for homogenous clients. Maybe that is appealing because of its simplicity.

My partner and I are just realizing how much mental energy we are exerting pricing new clients instead of simply having a “price list” that we go to without thinking (too much) about it. 

The interviews you’ve had with Dr. Paul Thomas have resonated with the simplicity that I refer to here. Each individual pays a certain price. No playing favorites. Some will require more attention than others. Because of this, they will lose money on some.

It has just struck me with this realization that customers/clients don’t want to be value-priced and they would likely object to it if they knew they were. I think I’ve made some mistakes pricing some prospects higher than others (for essentially the same work) and then not converting those prospects to clients.

Anyway, this may be mostly a jumbled ramble. If you care to share any thoughts, I’d be most appreciative.

Thanks,
Byron A. Johnson, MSc, CPA
Canada


Bonus Content is Available As Well

Did you know that each week after our live show, Ron and Ed take to the microphone for a bonus show? Typically, this bonus show is an extension of the live show topic (sometimes even with the same guest) and a few other pieces of news, current events, or things that have caught our attention.

Click the “FANATIC” image to learn more about pricing and member benefits. 

Bonus Episode 103, in which Ed tries to convince Ron to leave California, yet again, features conversations on several articles including: